You should blame the food producers, not consumers. There is a thing as psychological exploitation of dopamine pathways in the brain to achieve sales of your newest sugar laden breakfast cereals.
I believe overeating would be solved simply as a side-effect of bringing back healthy food options and banning sugar products.
Why should you be allowed to buy up low income neighborhood properties and hold them hostage? Your private property is guaranteed by state protection and it can be taken away by the state!
What I was trying to say was that; regardless of any explanation for why piracy happens, it is not the same as stealing physical goods. Corporate executives and MPAA types are mentally sick (they can't see past money) and go to the extent of gaslighting consumers into accepting their definitions because if they control the narrative then they can do anything and spin it as normal or only solution.
It's a service problem and I don't think those who refuse to contribute to the broken service problem are mentally ill. The "managers" in charge are.
I am not blaming normal people. I am calling industry and rich oligarhs mentally ill. Because is it not sick to want to do what they are doing?
I am merely peeved by how normalized "piracy is theft" has become, when in today's world corporates plunder the earth, commit wage theft, suppress collective bargaining, and don't want to pay taxes. It's so normalized that even piracy advocates have incorporated it into their vocabulary.
take a bigger bite out of overall corporate profits.
Don't co-adopt Corporate gaslighting. They can call it "opportunity cost", "expected return" or other bullshit. But it's all castles in the air dreamed up by profiteers.
It's never their money to begin with. It only becomes so because they want everyone to believe that making a copy of software deprives others from using it like physical goods.
The truth is that if somebody was going to pirate software, then they were never going to buy it in the first place and it's greedy and mentally ill to think otherwise.
If you talk shit instead of genuinely having trouble with something, any hobby group will not take it lightly. There's honestly trying and coming up empty, and then there's the "I don't have to put so much effort on other platform X" kind of response that indicates you are just trying to trash talk.
As if commercial or liable entity sre actually liable in reality! Are you claiming that you have privacy on reddit for example?. Lol spez is selling your data to openai.
It's not hard to understand that you're trying not to repeat yourself. But it's hard to understand how you expect this to be a valid way to argue online and how you expect people to go along with this.
If you have so much energy, please don't ask people to read your comment history. Do you really want people to read your comments and misinterpret them from what they were sypoosed to mean according to you? Are you going to be wasting more time correcting people for wrongly interpreting your comments in a different context?
That just makes it worse. I imagine it's kind of difficult to get out of being an actual member of any cult (like will smith) and you can accidentally end up in it. But being a honorary member? That shit is like you doing racist extra-curricular activities that highlights you to your school racist club.
You should blame the food producers, not consumers. There is a thing as psychological exploitation of dopamine pathways in the brain to achieve sales of your newest sugar laden breakfast cereals.
I believe overeating would be solved simply as a side-effect of bringing back healthy food options and banning sugar products.