If you read all of bluewing’s comments, the tone comes off, imo, as talking down to those of us who are concerned
And yet they specifically acknowledged the importance of pasteurization, etc, while simply saying in the right setting raw milk is tasty. That's not judging that's simply providing their perspective.
You are being overly sensitive and... IMO & LOL, "exuding a sense of superiority". Don't take it too seriously but I always find that basic hypocrisy - and I acknowledge we all do it - just so hilarious.
When kept below about 3C raw milk can last 7-10 days. The problem mainly is in the handling - the longer it's shipped and more it's handled the higher the likelihood it ends up above safe temperatures, reducing that time significantly. And we've all seen how grocery stores handle their perishables... LOL.
LOL... the downvoting. I think as usual people read the first sentence and that's it. So you saying "pasteurization is a good thing" got lost.
PASTEURIZATION IS A GOOD THING
But totally agree - raw milk, in the right situation and handled appropriately, which means COWS YOU KNOW is just so much better. To the point where after our one neighbor we'd get it from moved away I just stopped drinking milk at all.
Except the original comment was not. It was applied it to 334 million people and, critically, people on Lemmy, 99.998% of whom are in no way supporters of Trump and are in serious pain over the election results. They are your allies in the world of sane people and you lump them in with the people we mutually detest. That's not just horrendously insensitive, it's also stupid.
SCOTUS has the final say on what the Constitution should mean right now. They can decide however they want.
Not entirely. There are actually limits and checks on SCOTUS power, including the restrictions on what cases they can hear, the ability of congress to change the make up of the court and terms of appointments as well as change it's jurisdiction.
Now I grant it's easy to throw up one's hands and say "ah but that will never happen with a congress bowing and scraping to Trump" but I'd counter with two points: we can still gain majorities in the senate and house in 2026 and, crucially, if there's one thing you can count on it's the avaricious and rapacious nature of politicians.
I fully expect our entire country to slide into a deep recession and for there to be complete paralyzing chaos in the federal government over the next 4 years. That threatens the status quo, meaning congress critters ability to freely grift, make money off the stock market and remain in power. They won't like that.
You know now that you mention it, I've heard that all people who create usernames with the word "krash" in it have IQs well below 80, are generally pedophiles and tend to have really bad body odor. I could just be generalizing, but hey, seems accurate enough to me.
Anyways my point on that is largely philosophical the platonic ideals of farming if ya will,
So you are going to condemn farmers as a whole as incompetent morons because they are not perfectly in line with your ideal despite your lack of knowledge and experience or any real qualification beyond being slightly farming adjacent a handful of times. And frankly I think you made that up given that you couldn't even use the right terminology. I thought it was because English is not your native language. Ha.
Here's my unsolicited suggestion for you: read more. Your writing sucks, which is not a good thing for someone who likes to blather on.
Do you know what a "refrigerator" is?