efrique @ efrique @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

33

Joined

2 yr. ago

The "what percentage do you think" vs "what percentage are" would be much better either as a scatterplot with a y=x line, or as a ratio (think/are) vs actual percent

Here's a rough plot of the second thing. There's a number of issues with it but I think it more clearly conveys the crucial information

The first plot might arguably be better but you couldn't really see the way the ratio of overestimation decreased with more immigration as clearly as this one.

edit: Damn that came out way smaller than I expected. It's readable if you zoom in

I'm fine with this. "We can't succeed without breaking the law" isn't much of an argument.

Do I think the current copyright laws around the world are fine? No, far from it.

But why do they merit an exception to the rules that will make them billions, but the rest of us can be prosecuted in severe and dramatic fashion for much less. Try letting the RIAA know you have a song you've downloaded on your PC that you didn't pay for - tell them it's for "research and training purposes", just like AI uses stuff it didn't pay for - and see what I mean by severe and dramatic.

It should not be one rule for the rich guys to get even richer and the rest of us can eat dirt.

Figure out how to fix the laws in a way that they're fair for everyone, including figuring out a way to compensate the people whose IP you've been stealing.

Until then, deal with the same legal landscape as everyone else. Boo hoo

The very very few things I care to watch any more (and those almost entirely SBS and ABC) I can watch online. The other channels put together would be lucky to show anything I care about a few times a year. If they won't stream it online I just don't bother. If they won't put on any stuff I care to watch, that's their problem. My TV isn't even plugged into an aerial any more, it's only there to maybe use with the old games machines or maybe watch an old DVD

Just need to get AI on that.

damn

Among other issues that's going to make it harder for them to do other stuff.

Its showing for me

It has been a pretty short trip from "Don't be evil" to "The cutting edge of late stage capitalism"

face, meet leopard

git branch testing.stephanie.slept.with.my.friend.brad

Then delete and start over, or don't use data you don't have explicit permission to use. in the first place.

It's like a thief saying "well, I already fenced most of the stuff so it's too hard to give any of it back. So let's just call it quits, eh?"

or bloody universal healthcare

I guess it depends on where you live. It's not true of the whole world.

Waiting for 100% oral exams to make a comeback.

The headline's confusing. If a losing bet is backfiring, does that mean it's now a winning bet?

heh, all of them (plus several others) were on my list of "never buy from them" list a decade ago. Never had any reason to reconsider

Well, that's something I hadn't seen before.

It's not the word "lighter" that's the issue, it's the word "less". If I say something weighs 80% less, ... you know how much that is. 100% less, it weighs even less -- nothing at all. 500% less (i.e. 5 times less), suddenly it weighs more?

I've been saying for about 15 years now -- you'd have to be a masochist to buy HP printers. Why do people keep enabling these shits? You just encourage them to be even worse. Don't stand for even a little of their bullshit and they will change or die. You make a noose for your own neck.

Neither, though I do watch a bit of Matt Parker on youtube, so it's a decent guess.

It's a publicly traded company. It's owned by shareholders. You may be thinking of the CEO.