You'd have to be an idiot to merge anything from an AI without going through it line by line. Which really is the problem with AI, it's mostly fine if you keep an eye on it but the fact you have to keep an eye on it kind of renders the whole thing pointless.
It's like self-driving cars, if I have to keep an eye on it to make sure it won't randomly crash into a tree I might as well drive the damn thing myself.
I guess I have no problem in theory with AI agents taking a look at my code it's just I would want it opt in only. I don't want to have to deal with them on legacy projects that I'm not working on, or anything mission critical (if there is a bug in the code but the application overall still works, I'd rather not have an AI dick around with it until I have time to properly go through it).
To be clear, I would have the same objections to a human doing the same things. It's just that most humans don't randomly submit pull requests on otherwise inactive repos.
Wait but that's like saying that as long as the world has at least one electric car the internal combustion engine can continue to exist without issue.
If the vast majority of cryptocurrencies are still power hungry and the most commonly used cryptocurrency is power hungry then the fact that some of the others are better doesn't really help.
People could get tons of flows improved by not abusing Excell as a database.
We have our knowledge articles in an excel spreadsheet. If you wrote a virus that would scan every single Excel file and just delete any spreadsheet without any formulae in it you would cause enormous amounts of suffering but not do any actual damage.
Does he have a robot army I'm unaware of? Where is he getting the troops for an attack in 4 years?
They are effectively already at war with NATO and they're getting their asses handed to them, a direct full-scale no holds-barred conflict would not end well for them.
Don't worry they'll probably give the contract to a company that up until now there's only ever manufactured shopping trolleys. That's usually the play.
If they ever are delivered it'll be sometime around 2099 just in time for all the oceans to dry up.
If bitcoin didn't use 40 terawatts to mine and was more reasonable in its electricity demand then I don't think that many people would care about it. It still wouldn't make it useful but at least it wouldn't be actively damaging the environment.
We might even be able to find a use for it at that point. But as it stands now the energy requirements essentially make the technology not worth it given the very minor benefits.
I hate that argument because it's already been disproven. People use guns to kill people, often in heated situations.
If everyone wasn't wandering around with guns in their pockets all of the time then they wouldn't be the opportunity to shoot someone. Things would massively improve if the law was simply adjusted to not allow people to carry guns in public and they're only allowed to keep them in their house and other authorised locations such as gun rangers and designated hunting locations. The gun nuts will still be able to play with their toys, but the murder rate would drop.
I don't know what you're saying. If I charge a particular amount for a loaf of bread and then the cryptocurrency value drops halfway through the day then that person still has the bread but I now don't have the money.
The whole point of currency is to get away from the fluctuating value of exchange that everyone had to deal with when we used to buy things with gold and semi-precious stones.
You'd have to be an idiot to merge anything from an AI without going through it line by line. Which really is the problem with AI, it's mostly fine if you keep an eye on it but the fact you have to keep an eye on it kind of renders the whole thing pointless.
It's like self-driving cars, if I have to keep an eye on it to make sure it won't randomly crash into a tree I might as well drive the damn thing myself.