Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DU
Posts
1
Comments
419
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Err, you're wrong.

    I only pay $25/month for unlimited data. My bill didn't go up, either.

    Whether they supplied me with a phone or not, I'd still be paying the same price.

    In fact, I was using my own phone initially but they offered me an upgrade for free.

  • My point is that I don't care for people who want more money. Those who need it should come first.

    Greedy, entitled people have been conflating to the two to fool others into thinking they always 'need' more. Just look at these comments. Some people really don't know the difference between want and need.

  • No, I don't hate actors. You clearly don't get it.

    I keep saying I have no sympathy for greedy people. Globally speaking, most people living in LA are wealthy. They're just passing that wealth around at the top which is why other places of the world stagnate.

    It's a cultural issue. You're just upset someone is criticizing that culture of consumerism.

  • Right. Do you know the difference between a need and a want?

    It's not like these people are surviving off of peanut butter sandwiches.

    Please, tell the starving kids of Africa those in LA aren't making enough money.

  • I'm assuming this has something to do with the new PM threatening the profits of the wealthy?

    That's usually when these things happen. People just can't stand the idea of their overlords making less money.

    Yeah, everything in this article is centered around the new PM threatening the status quo (rich people getting richer). It even uses coded language like "upsetting key Western allies."

    Of course a member of their """democratic""" party will have an issue if whoever is elected democratically threatens the wealthy.

  • They're not doing it to 'make ends meet.' That implies they're struggling to survive, not thrive.

    Maybe once they start getting screwed over by copyright and patent laws, they'll stop advocating for them.

    Then we can have AI movies, real movies, and any blend of the two. Only problem is nobody can use the government to protect their ideas.

    It will result in cheaper products and services all around the world, at the expense of those making way too much money right now.