drspod @ drspod @lemmy.ml

Posts

13

Comments

752

Joined

4 yr. ago

They are included in the updates to -testing.

Only after they meet the requirements to be moved from unstable.

From the wiki:

It is a good idea to install security updates from unstable since they take extra time to reach testing and the security team only releases updates to unstable.

and

Compared to stable and unstable, next-stable testing has the worst security update speed. Don't prefer testing if security is a concern.

https://wiki.debian.org/DebianTesting

There is some advice on that page about how to deal with security updates for testing and I'm wondering how people who use testing take that advice, and what changes they make to get security updates. Or maybe you don't bother. That's what I mean.

What do you do for security updates?

I wouldn't waste too much energy thinking about the ravings of a deranged TERF billionaire transphobe.

Was the server officially released by Blizzard or was it reverse-engineered and built by the community?

What are the specs and how are you finding the performance?

You could argue that the URLs are not wrong, but that the error is committed by the reader in expecting the output to somehow be based in reality.

I could roll a dice to generate a URL and then say "but it's a wrong URL!" I don't think many people would blame the dice.

J. K. Rowling is a transphobe and a bigot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-order_logic

Tragic, but is this World News?

What about an independent regulator for parliamentary ethics?

Fuck Palantir.

https://web.archive.org/web/20250704102555/https://democracyforsale.substack.com/p/starmer-has-broken-his-promise-sleaze-corruption

God, I can't stand this finance-bro vocabulary infiltrating people's normal speech.

The real cost of bad haircuts.

two for the price of fun(gus)

London bankers are going to have to sober up for a little while.

14*14=196

What’s their margin? Are they profitable?

There aren’t any, thats the point I’m making. Petitions produce sample bias that excludes the opinions of people who don’t want their legal name and home address printed on a document that might get passed around God-knows-where.

Information on Personal Data:

To sign, you must provide a set of personal data, which is required by the authorities of your country for verification purposes. Specific measures are in place to ensure the protection of your data. See our privacy statement.

Perhaps if signing a petition didn't require doxxing yourself then more people would sign.

I realize that it's to prevent fake signatures and allow verification that the signatories are residents of the jurisdiction under petition, but this method inherently creates a sampling bias.

In the same vein as age verification, we need a solution for digital attestation that preserves anonymity and privacy. There are some initiatives in this direction, so perhaps we will get there some day.