Duh. If he's in debt, he just needs to buy more iPhones to resell them at a lower value. This is not hard to understand.
Or better still, create a network of resellers who would buy iPhones in exchange for recruiting additional iPhone resellers (imagine a pyramid). The growth potential is almost infinite!
But what if they did??? I wouldn't be such an idiot then, eh? So the only difference is that it was not real? Well so much for the tolerance of the so-called 'frogs gay-makers'.
Fun fact: at the very beginning of the evolution of the game, there was only one move - en passant. And the game was called 'en passant game'. 'En passant' comes from the old phoenician 'heēn pąšhãnn' meaning approximately 'en passant'.
The players would take turns doing en passant moves until ultimately no further move could be done, at which point the loser would be eviscerated and his entrails offered in sacrifice to Ba'al. Then everybody would discuss how the loser's opening sucked and how many blunders he did.
Yes, we're in it right now. I am studying game theory and I am experimenting on novel aspects of the prisoner's dilemma. Actually it was my assistant who did the study.
legitimate telemetry data