Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)ZO
Posts
1
Comments
920
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Even if there was an intention to buy it, companies aren't entitled to consumers' money.

    Then you’re not entitled to ingest the content being created by that “company” (doesn’t have to be a company, it could be a single artist or a small group of artists).

    Taking away licenses is wrong. I’m not disputing that. But that doesn’t magically make stealing something that actual people created right.

  • Creating a competitor is not the same logic at all. That competitor gets paid when someone buys their product.

    The issue is that time and effort are put into something that is being made to get compensation for that time and effort, not to be given away for free. If you’re going to a competing product, you’re not ingesting the initial product without paying for it.

    I’m not arguing legal definitions. I’m arguing against the bullshit mental gymnastics that piracy is not stealing. It is. Just admit it and move on. I don’t care if people pirate. I just can’t stand the dishonesty of trying to justify theft. If you ingest something that an artist made to try and make a livelihood and don’t pay them, you’re stealing that livelihood.

  • It is stealing. I don’t understand the mental gymnastics here. You’re stealing income from whoever created the content if you’re not paying them for your ability to watch it.

  • Oh wow! You’re so smart! You caught a reference from one of the best-selling and most-watched animated films of all time!

    You are exhausting. You could have just answered my question and been done with it. Instead, you had to feign offense because you assumed I missed a point while then completely missing mine.

    It must be just the worst making yourself feel persecuted all day.

  • First off, I didn’t call you a bigot. I said that blaming a lack of children on her being gay is bigoted.

    Second of all, based on this, you seem to be the one looking for adversaries. You’re the one who posted this.

    Lastly, I get the point of primitive fears being silly. I wasn’t disputing that or arguing against it in any way. I’m asking why you even have the fear to begin with. You didn’t say anything about the gay people’s genes before. You said something about your wife’s genes stopping with her only child. The situation with your wife’s genes are the same whether your daughter is gay or not.

  • I already did read it. Now go back and read what I said. Your daughter can still be gay and she can have children. You have lost nothing.

    Edit: Also, you don’t have to be a condescending jerk when you’re the one missing the point while assuming that I missed yours.

  • Maybe you should have stated it better, then.

    To be clear, I get that your point about control and everything. I’m only taking issue with your introduction where you pretend being gay and not having children are the same thing.

  • You know that being a gay or lesbian doesn’t prevent you from being able to have children, right?

    Having a personal issue with her not having children (if that’s what she decides) is ok. Blaming it on her being gay is just bigoted. She could have been born straight and still decided not to have children and you’d be in the same place.

  • The only downside is that if you shift into VR from AR, your keyboard is occluded. Not so bad when you’re already typing but hard to find if you need to do something locally in meatspace and then need to come back. I feel like they need some training to keep the keyboard from occluding if it’s detected.