From Merriam-Webster: 1. : methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to the natural scientist. 2. : an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation. I was refering to the second meaning.
Why downvoted?! We are in jnpopular opinion, arent't we? :)
The temptation to consider that society's failures and the need to compensate for them don't exist is strong. It's one of scientism's best tropes. Yet here we are. If one asks your question truthfully (and not rethoricaly) and gives themselves the means to answer it rigorously, they're woke.
I finally installed RethinkDNS on my phone. I configured redirections to invidious and other alternative front-ends on firefox, desktop but also mobile thanks to the recent update. I stopped appending "!g" to all my duckduckgo searches. And i got so addicted to a new social network that I quit all others LOOKING AT YOU LEMMY
I don't want to stray from OP's question, but as it's already been answered: have you guys read the following paper on pre-fart gas re-entering the blood stream through the colon's wall?
I have a kid, so I needed to think this through before teaching it. I ended up teaching the kid that you would need to look everywhere at all times, but that would require having eyes everywhere, right? So you just start looking in the direction where cars could come first, and then you keep looking rightleftrightleft until you crossed the damn street
Voilà ! My first great piece of advice found on Lemmy! So thankful for this, and for witnessing the sudden growth of a great community here on Lemmy <3
From Merriam-Webster: 1. : methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to the natural scientist. 2. : an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation. I was refering to the second meaning.
Why downvoted?! We are in jnpopular opinion, arent't we? :)