dhork @ dhork @lemmy.world

Posts

6

Comments

4,275

Joined

2 yr. ago

I bet there are Conservative morons out there who say "See! Life is good for these people back home, they have cell service after all!"

Not necessarily for good reasons, though. Particularly over the last decade or so.

He doesn't even have the "just woke up from a 40-year coma" vote sewn up, since there's a Cuomo running....

The Republican is the Guardian Angels guy from the 80s, he's probably not relevant outside of Staten Island, and a few old cat ladies.

The Republican in the race is the old Guardian Angels guy from the 70s and 80s. He's a bit of a clown, has gotten caught in a bunch of lies, and said stupid and sexist shit on the radio. But he hates Donald Trump, and owns a bunch of cats. He seems like an elder statesman when compared against your average MAGAt.

But he doesn't stand a chance, even with all these people running. Adams beat him last time 2-to-1, and nobody liked Adams in the last election, either.

Only because we keep lowering the bar for him. We disqualified Howard Dean because he screamed funny....

The actual, literal quote speaks for itself

And I have to tell you, Europe has a lot of spirit for this war. A lot of people, you know, when I first got involved, I really didn't think they did, but they do. And I saw that a month ago when you were there, most of you many of you were there. The level of esprit de corps spirit that they have is amazing.

Isnt Ken Paxton's wife divorcing him, on "biblical grounds", as she puts it? Maybe Abbott, Musk, and Paxton are a throuple....

I'm still not convinced that the Daily Beast didn't get trolled, I havebt seen this anywhere else yet

For those of you who don't know, Putin literally stole one of the Patriots' owners SB rings.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/heres-how-vladimir-putin-stole-a-super-bowl-ring-from-the-patriots-robert-kraft/

No, I disagree. I know 80 year olds who won the genetic lottery and are still sharp and can operate a car just fine. I know others who probably shouldn't be on the highway anymore, but they have accepted that and only use their car to get around locally. They know their limits and work within them.

One older person I know is a perfectly safe driver, who used to be an expert navigator, but now once you get him off of his well-known routes he will spend forever looking for "that next turn" and end up driving off in a random direction. His family tries very hard to discourage him from driving alone now.

Yes, younger people mature at different rates, but the decline of older people is much more varied and there is a much larger range of age and abilities to consider. There is no practical way to differentiate solely based on age. Even in states where they periodically retest older drivers, all 3 of the cases I stated above would probably pass. (While a 4th older driver, who is perfectly fine driving by themselves but gets confused while being talked to while driving, would fail because they wouldn't process the tester's directions in real time).

It's a convenient filter to weed out any lawyers in the department with ethics, and replace them with lawyers who will do what the Boss wants, no matter what. They even admit it:

"Any sanctimonious career bureaucrat expressing faux outrage over the President’s policies while sitting idly by during the rank weaponization by the previous administration has no grounds to stand on," White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in a statement.

Which is Trumpspeak for "We want anyone with an independant code of ethics gone"....

Well, yeah, he wants to award all the contracts to companies him and his cronies control....

He can do whatever the fuck he wants, as long as half of Congress permits him to do so by not impeaching him.

I'm not. The next phase of Trumpism won't need votes from citizens, only from Congress....

"Oh shoot, when the DOGEies were here they must have deleted it all. No biggie though, there was nothing interesting in it at all...."

He doesn't care, if he stays in power past Jan 2029 he won't need votes to do it....

Of course not. You only get the refund if you "behave", and we've already established that this Administration thinks any foreigner who can't afford 5 million dollars is a criminal....

Well, there are.... let's call them extra-judicial remedies. But those might turn out doing more harm than good.

I am referring specifically to the Supreme Court case that gave the President immunity to break the law in his official capacity, and reserved for the Court itself the task of determining what is Official. So if the President breaks rhe law in his official capacity, the only way to punish him is impeachment....

The Gold Card is a residency permit, so unless rules change again Gold Card holders wouldn't need visas so wouldn't have to pay the new fee.

And I don't think it's that we want only rich tourists. It's that we are treating all foreigners as criminals. If you think of it more like "every foreigner belongs in jail, but you can pay bail to get out" it makes more sense. You only get your "bail" refunded if you "behave"....

Yes, and he is right. The President can basically do whatever the fuck he wants now, as long as at least 1/2 the House (or 1/3 of the Senate) let him, because the sole remedy for a rogue President is impeachment.