derphurr @ derphurr @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

123

Joined

2 yr. ago

Remember when the silly mummy ET dolls posts hit? Lol literally zero common sense or logic or thinking allowed

Somehow you are missing:

Captain Disillusion

Internet Comment Etiquette

AvE & This Old Tony & ElectroBOOM

ZeFrank

No they found the guy who stole the newspapers

admitted he took the newspapers because of the front page story

Plaindealer is not disclosing Choate’s relationship to the sexual assault case.

The theft was not connected in any way to the three defendants in the case, their families or the Ouray Police Department.

I'm not a Sherlock, but if you read those two together, sounds like the victim's (who was never named) relative (father?) stole the newspapers?

Otherwise they wouldn't have the sentence about not disclosing

You probably "should" be embarrassed your police chief allows his step son to gang rape a girl in his house and no one is in jail.

So the victim woke up, couldn't find her clothes and left with police chiefs sweatshirt in mid May. Goes to hospital and they call Sheriff obviously, but he can't investigate because he hired the police chief and was former chief and his investigator also had worked for the police chief. So obviously they have to involve CBI (state investigator)

May gang rape... Then "CBI agents interviewed suspects in July"... Then.. "July 20, agents used a search warrant to seize evidence from the police chief’s house"... To "were all arrested on warrants for suspected felony sexual assault in December. All have posted bail and been released from jail"

Oh and the police chief knew for month about the investigation. CBI took two months to even question suspects or collect evidence... Another five months to charge anyone.

They left freaking bite marks on the girl.

The DNA tests on samples collected during the hospital sexual assault exam matched Trujillo – in a vaginal sample – and Dieffenderffer – from a bite mark.

But over half of them support Putin.

Just like the US citizens deserve the hellscape Trump will bring. Just like UK citizens deserve poverty and empty grocery stores for their Brexit vote.

Quit pretending these country citizens shouldn't be condemned to the hell the tacitly approved of. It doesn't matter if one Russian or one Texan doesn't support their dictator, enough of their neighbors do. So suffer for your country and for the sins of your neighbors. They didn't do enough to stop it.

Other than Hollywood Ten (1948), and Rita Lavelle (1984) they won't do any time. Even Bannon got sentenced under same thing as Navarro and won't do any time.

Just got to run out the clock until Trump re-elected

Other than Hollywood Ten (1948), and Rita Lavelle (1984) they won't do any time. Even Bannon got sentenced under same thing as Navarro and won't do any time.

Biden should file Amicus brief with SCOTUS presidential immunity case saying if they are so ok with what Trump's lawyers are saying, he has Seal Team 6 standing by awaiting their ruling.

There isn't enough meat here to say if this is expected or nefarious. For one thing those in FL over 90 yrs are a few percentage more registered D than R. So voters removed from rolls due to SSA dB death records or FL death records will favor D over R by 5%

We don't know how many are students, which are the largest group of purged through postcard address verification. Moving states, registering in other counties, not updating address, etc. Younger FL voters are more likely registered D than R.

You'd want to look at AAMVA and ERIC lookups, and where the purges come from. You are also removed from voter rolls for not voting in recent federal general elections (last two)

On the other hand, Florida Republicans have actively improperly ratfucked the rolls like 2000.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/united-states-v-state-florida

https://www.projectvote.org/press-releases/florida-purge-program-was-illegal-rules-federal-court/

https://www.usccr.gov/files/pubs/vote2000/report/exesum.htm

unar is the free version and should be in Ubuntu

You don't know what you are talking about. Taking Ohio as example when 3rd parties sued for ballot access, Libs had 3% of the vote, 4-6% for statewide.

https://lpedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_Party_of_Ohio_Historical_Election_Results

Green Party with 1% to 3% when allowed on General election ballots

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Party_of_Ohio

Not sure what your definition of "enough support" is. Ohio repubs then tailored the law to exclude any future 3rd parties. (Through petition signatures which amount to millions in CPRS)

Ohio is one example that took away third party ballot access. The first hurdle would be getting 60,000 valid voter signatures in a limited time frame. Then you would need to get 120,000 General election votes for a Gov candidate. Arkansas etc are similar

https://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_political_parties_in_Ohio

Other examples can be found https://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_political_parties_in_the_United_States

Presidential primaries did not exist until the 20th century, and they did not have a major impact on conventions until many years later. In 1960, John F. Kennedy won several Democratic primaries, but Lyndon Baines Johnson remained the favorite of the party establishment.

At any rate it was the Convention that selected candidate until...

After the controversial 1968 presidential cycle, the Democrats began to reform their nomination process to make it more inclusive and transparent, and to make its results more representative of the will of the party as a whole, not just the party bosses and insiders.

Sorry. Buchanan primaried Bush Sr. (Incumbent)

they can by saying that the state’s ruling stands because it’s up to the states to run their own elections, which it is.

Do you know what SCOTUS even if? No states cannot interpret 14th Amendment because it's "their" election. SCOTUS has final say.

And there are many arguments against Biden giving aide to the enemy, which if you are paying attention to the Republicans have listed their many arguments they will use in court. I suggest you read their articles of impeachment as a starting point.

If SCOTUS leaves it up to states, and leaves it self executing for 14th. It means anyone can file civil action.

You might think Biden is not in violation of 14th, but many Republican secretary of states DO think so. It's very vague just like used in CO, "given aid or comfort to the enemies" will be up to courts to interpret.

Clinton loss wasn't because of voters. It was DNC rigging the system to favor a loser candidate. That is what will happen this year. Trump probably is one of the secret largest supporter of DNC.

A. Primaries have existed since 1972. 1976 Ford primaried by Reagan. 1980 incumbent Carter challenged by Ted Kennedy. 1992 Ross Perot.

If B is true, they shouldn't be able to use tax dollars and public employees for their primary elections. They should have to fund and administer their private org election themselves. In fact, in many states only the two parties even have access to primary ballots.

C. DNC could care less about winning. See also Bernie.

She didn't defeat anyone, DNC did all her dirty work.