Interesting how it's changed over the years. I was a deputy returning officer a few elections ago and the official line then was that pencil was the accepted implement because it was less likely to smudge and spoil a ballot.
Of course, you'd have to make sure the pens were all the same colour, otherwise it could be used to mark ballots (I. E. I use my green pen to prove I voted for so and so). That could circumvent the secret ballot.
You mean the bill that would have required all Canadians to share personal information with adult websites? The bill she hand waved away any privacy concerns about?
It's an anti-porn bill, "think of the children" is just the excuse.
Canada already has good gun control. We've had it for decades. Very, very few lawful gun owners commit crimes with their guns.
The last government has been great at announcing ever longer lists of guns to ban but has yet to seize a single one. The list gets longer, the date it takes effect keeps getting pushed out too.
Focus on the source of guns used in crimes: our neighbors to the south. Performative bans of experimental guns and historic rifles makes no one safer.
I agree with the lawyer that harassment is a bit of a stretch but it's not a good look to pester someone to change data you don't like (see also "don't believe the polls" from the blue team)
It's cope, and not something you see from someone who expects to win.
you have to be there when the code was written and went through the various iterations.
Well, we don't have that. We're mostly dealing with other people's mistakes and tech debt. We have messy things like nested stored procedures.
If all we get is some high level documentation of how components interact I'm happy. From there we can start splitting off the useful chunks for human review.
I'm in software and we're experimenting with using it for certain kinds of development work, especially simpler things like fixing identified vulnerabilities.
We also have a pilot started to see if one can explain and document an old code base no one knows anymore.
I like to think that there's a slice of that awful third with enough awareness to know that even if they like what Trump is doing in theory, he is definitely not on team Canada.
This is the right answer. There's no point in trying, because it's not about him getting a specific thing, it's about him getting a kick out of people scurrying to meet his demands.
We got a deal that satisfied him with CUSMA. Now it's "the worst deal ever"
Totally agree. "Make an outrageous demand" is one of the few tools in trumps repitoire.
Even if we did somehow ascede to it, he'd just come up with something new. The point is to have something to hang over us, not to actually get the thing.
Attack the idea, not the source. Are there errors in the article?