Seriously asking: do we think right field voters are answering CBC polls?
Yesterday my Canadian, trump supporting boss, closed out our office's management meeting saying "trump endorsed Carney. Do you think it's reverse psychology?" And the response from one of her middle managers was "Carney doesn't give a shit about Canadians. He just is interested in his wallet."
The propaganda machines are hitting hard already, and I promise you those two would never visit the CBC website let alone answer a CBC survey.
Agreed... although I would go a step further and say distributing the LLM model or the results of use (even if done without cost) is not fair use, as the training materials weren't licensed.
I don't know what we you're referring to, but in the part of central Ontario where my nephew attends school, the French immersion schools are most definitely teaching Quebecois French.
I tried speaking real French with my nephew and he reacted as if I was a space alien.
The Tribunal was created in 2014 to bring a new approach to international environmental law, modelled on approaches to war crimes and human rights. Although the tribunal’s rulings are non-binding, they have a track record of impacting outcomes on the ground.
I loved the idea of navidrome and also briefly ran an instance, and like you use plexamp heavily. I stopped using Navi because one day it broke, and I found the plexamp experience just better.
The problem is that for us there is a big difference between municipally run, province-run, and federally run parks. We also have private parks, privately owned but publically accessible parks, and of course, amusement parks.
Not quite. Graphene provides 'legacy extended support' which means they'll patch any vulnerabilities they become aware of for the OS, but because they don't have baseband source they won't be able to address any vulnerabilities in the baseband unless Google releases an update.
The most recent release of grapheneos for 4a is less than a week old.
Weird. The 32x has its own power supply.