Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
126
Joined
4 wk. ago

  • Companies only answer to profit and unfortunately we get to see the results. Can't have those proles making 250 million dollars now. That would eat into the profits of our shareholders.

  • Well there wasn't any path for anyone to report anyone before so this is better than nothing.

  • Hmm

    Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias alongside AARP Illinois

    Guess the old regulations might have been eating into profits

    Still out of 55,000 administered tests only 97 failed. Imho they should keep the restriction because it did remove 97 unsafe drivers.

    However, This also creates a path for immediate family members to report unsafe elderly family members. There was no way to report anyone before this was created.

    So is it midlyinfurating? I suppose in that it may allow unsafe drivers to stay on the roads but with immediate family reporting it could also be a wash. I very much doubt these changes will pull more unsafe drivers than the regulations from before since family members will probably be hesitant to report elderly family members

  • Thats what happens when DOGE fires a bunch of NOAA meteorologists.

  • What did I just watch 😵‍💫

  • 😭 I see the error of my thinking Comrade Stalin. I will do better in the future

  • Isn't this exclusively the purview of the orange one cell brain cat? Or does the apply to other breeds as well?

  • Oh dude I am positive they're women brains that work like this as well. In fact it's probably a whole lot more that you would believe.

  • I hope Stephen Miller's toilet paper turns to sandpaper every time he tries to use it.

    Edit:

    Apologies for accidentally cursing Steve Miller

  • Right but they would still have time to respond on top of that it's not like the US is very close to China. And even if we did send her aircraft carriers in to go mess with China that would be a really hard fight for the United states. I don't think it would go well.

    On top of the fact that China really wants the US position in the world to be weak. It would be very beneficial for China to be the strongest and take over that title because it sure as shit isn't going to Russia right now

  • Can you show me in the Constitution where that is explicitly outlawed? Because I've read the entire Constitution and it says nothing about legislation hiring private security.

    I didn't say the Democrats should force their way in, I just said that they should bring armed private security and then make a scene.

    I said nothing of open Revolt. You are adding implications to thing my comment.

    Regardless it would be nice if the Democrats put a little more energy into things and stop with this performative bullshit like going to an ice facility they know they won't be allowed in. Is it bullshit yeah but they should probably make a bigger fuss about it at the place like when Senator Padilla got arrested. Makes better headlines.

    As far as being a state actor I would be a piss poor State actor.

  • Did anyone else notice that you couldn't use this on an Android device because it it may put the people who use it at risk?

    For shame Android

    Developer may not actually understand how phones work

    https://lemmy.ml/comment/19647328

  • Given that China has the world's seconds largest economy and they are trying to break into all of the foreign markets the US is currently in I don't think they care.

    I'm sure some of them care about their portfolio but that's going to look great under Trump.

    I think for them if the US goes full fascist it's a win-win.

    As long as we're focused on our own internal politics and not messing with China or trying to disable their economy I really really don't think they care.

    Edit: Do you guys at least have a source on this claim that China wants a stable us?

  • Oh yes wasting everybody's time by demanding to be let in to do an inspection when they know they're not going to be let in.

    We've done this song and dance before. They'll go to court and they'll be let in for a token inspection.

    As far as armed contingent not that the Democrats are going to do shit but private security is definitely a thing. So is armed private security.

    At least I'm not spreading around dead ideas that don't work that waste people's time and and activism.

    Edit: FYI depending on the frontend you use, you can add a user tag so that you can tag me as "fake Leninist" and save us both sometime

    For instance I got you as "boot" probably for some defense of the United States that we argued about.

  • How is this doing their job and what did they accomplish?