confusedbytheBasics @ confusedbytheBasics @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

247

Joined

2 yr. ago

As it should be. Death to prewritten campaigns and railroading. Read the sections of Dungeon World about campaign and session planning. I don't recommend the game itself but those sections are a gold mine for how to run a fun and rewarding game in general.

You answered the why not without answering the what you want part. I'm sure you have a good reason to prioritize finances over your goals though. Good luck.

Trans-men who hit on everything that moves and trans-women who are hyper focused on passing.

I'm half done. I've kept up my health and I'm trying to improve it even more. When I hit 65 I won't be too old to do much.

But the real question should be what are you waiting until retirement to do and why not do it sooner?

This is like 90% accurate.

Did you literally just prompt Lawrence and get this?

I'm curious about the permanent ability to roar. Who has experience with that?

Let's be clear, I will absolutely use my vote in whichever way is most likely to keep Trump out of office.

But which primary should I vote in? Will the Dems even have a primary? Should I register with another party that has a primary?

#1 Are you not familiar with thought experiments?

#2 cool story bro.

An economy only works when a majority participates. An ideal economy has everyone participating.

You can do a basic thought experiment to figure this out. Imagine 10 people control $100 trillion. Everyone else controls $0. What do you think you'll be able to get for $1?

You might then say, "money isn't wealth." True. But if 10 people control all the wealth and everyone else has starved to death that's even worse.

Capping the amount of wealth anyone can inherit seems sane to me. In fact it seems healthy for the whole economy, so not just sane but prudent. If you let all the wealth be collected by a few the system breaks down and all the money becomes worthless. Preventing that is entirely sane.

I'm against preventing the transfer all all property. That seems like a recipe for corruption but I'd vote for limiting it to a trust of like $50-$100 million maximum plus an occupied home, a vacation home, and some reasonable amount of small property like boats and cars. Honestly that amount seems excessive to me but I think the majority would be in favor of such a law.

What makes you think this opinion will die on the Internet?

Does not check out. My espresso machine is the mirror image of the one in this meme but I use Fedora.

++ Totally. 10€ a month can't be close to the value of the data. If the cost was actually based on the value of the data it might be a valid choice.

I'm still curious where coercion comes into it?

You choose to visit Facebook. They've always provided services funded by your data. Now you get to choose between that model or compensating them directly.

Where does the coercion come in?

PS, I hate Facebook and don't use it in case that matters somehow.

Who are we paying these interest payments to? Retirement accounts? Billionaires? Other countries?

That is pretty nice IMO. So if you have Safari does it autoconvert to jpeg xl?

Thanks. I remember Google news showing an article about them already deprecating webp but now I don't see it. I wonder what format the article was about.