Doesn't matter if its fake or not - it's going to severely damage the reputation of the ai search summary. And that's a good thing I suppose - still this is misinformation.
Correct because she was told by multiple parties to not do the surgery and euthanized. She followed vet, rescue, and shelter recommended advice - then the shelter fixed the dog and she's offering to pay for the surgery that she didn't know would save its life.
Also, I wasn't trying to be a dick. I apologize for the way I addressed you.
Yeah, she did sign it - what I said applies. But other factors are being overlooked - this clearly isnt as black and white as the shelter seems to be making it.
I just download all the extra ram and gigabits I need from ads I see on Fox news dotcom, works fjn efnor meerrreerrttynygnngnhnhm fklsbfnlltkkfovfñngjkkkjdjjffjjjnnvnvnvnggnnggnngn ff f f f f. F f. F f f f f f f f f f. G g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g
I have read it now, thank you. I am at work and just made a quick assumption.
In most cases I would still stand by what I said above. There has been a few times a cat has come to us to be euthanized and we managed to pull them back from the brink of death and we've adopted them back out to other people after considering the animals welfare.
This sounds like a PR nightmare - and there are always exceptions to policies.
In this case - it would sound like she might have legal ground as she was coached by the rescue to put the dog down. I amend my opinion as stated above and side with her. I would fight my rescue if this happened where I volunteer.
I will leave my other comment as is for posterity.
This is a bad take my dude. I can assure you this an agonizing choice she needed to make and I'm sure her heart is broken. I've worked in rescue for a hot minute - I've seen this - it's not easy at all., for anyone involved.
It's a valid reason. If you surrender the dog because you don't have the resources to take care of the dog, then that's it - youve made a one time deal. Your ownership for the animals life.
She signed the animal away. She saved its life by surrendering it, but now she needs to move on with the knowledge that the dog will be safe and loved - the end result is no different for her. She no longer has the dog.
It's not meant to be harsh. It's the reality of rescue. The rescue has to protect itself and the animal. When she's in a better place, she can adopt again - there are so many animals that need help.
Doesn't matter if its fake or not - it's going to severely damage the reputation of the ai search summary. And that's a good thing I suppose - still this is misinformation.