chiliedogg @ chiliedogg @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

2,661

Joined

2 yr. ago

There's some nuance on whether it's floodplain or floodway.

It gets technical, but the easy answer is that floodplain us where the waters will rise, while floodway is the path along which water is intended to travel. Lots of the time, the floodplain and the floodway are the same thing, but not always.

Development in the floodplain can sometimes be achieved through a floodplain development permit with a no-rise certification (there will be no net rise of water level in event of a flood caused by the development in the floodplain)

Development in the floodway is generally a hard no, because the floodway is where you want the water to go, and you want water flowing fast in the floodway to clear space for the water coming in behind it. Putting structures on stilts increases friction and slows water down, causing it to back up more upstream.

I have a separate cell phone for city business, so I don't have ANY cross-contamination between personal and city data.

And it's been handy in Open Records requests where reporters have asked for my phone and text logs. With the personal and city info being separate, I don't have to worry about needing the state AG to authorize reductions.

I black out sensitive data (there's a list of what kinds of data should be redacted without an AG opinion), and I hand it over.

To what end?

We can't just kick people out of their existing homes or shut down businesses because the maps changed around them. We allow existing structures to remain, but if they're wiped out in a flood we don't allow them to be rebuilt.

The tricky part is when you get outside of cities into counties, where there's generally no permits required for building structures. It's the utilities and subdivision improvements that get attention because they require government involvement.

And strictly speaking, development in the floodplain is prohibited by FEMA, not the county. So the county will tell you "no" if you ask, but they aren't actively hunting for it.

In cities with code enforcement and building permits in a smaller area of land it's a little easier, but even then in my tiny city it's hard to find everything that gets done illegally. It's usually spotted when the neighbors complain, or if our inspectors happen to see it while looking at a neighbor's property.

Just last week we found someone that had filled in a detention pond, scraped all the trees out of the back of their lot (trees provide erosion control and friction to slow down and spread water), and added about 1500 square feet of concrete (speeds up water flow and reduces amount absorbed into ground) when the neighbor asked our arborist to identify which trees needed to come down for fire safety.

I'm published in watershed analysis - specifically stormwater discharge. I work in a municipal development office in Texas and specialize in drainage plans.

That's simply not accurate.

You generally can't build in the 100-year floodplain. What happened here, from a drainage engineering standpoint, is a combination of 3 factors:

1. Many of the buildings in question were built prior to the flood plain being defined in that location, and existing non-conforming structures are generally allowed to remain.
2. New buildings were built a few years back, but out of the 100-year floodplain. Part of that was a floodplain map revision. These can be obtained through FEMA if an engineer provides an analysis showing either that mitigation techniques will change the floodplain area or that the flood maps are incorrect. Many flood plain maps are decades old, and the actual flood areas are different for a variety of reasons.

Unfortunately, there are also engineers who will stamp whatever you put in front of them if you pay them, and there are in fact engineers who specialize in saying "yes" and providing bad analysis to get around drainage, detention, and floodplain requirements. Lots of them are foreign-based, which is why most Texas jurisdictions have started requiring engineers licensed in Texas so we can go after their credentials when their bad engineering leads to failure. The reality is FEMA doesn't have the resources to double-check the analysis of every project, and they must rely on the engineer's stamp as evidence that best practices have been used.

3. This wasn't a 100-yr flood event. If all the cabins had been located outside of the 100-yr it likely wouldn't have changed anything.

What we need to do is start a campaign talking about how he's not smart enough or brave enough to try and revoke her citizenship.

Dude is easily manipulated.

Not just MAGA. Coasts count.

You want to hear about a game to play?

Clair Obscur. Made from former Ubisoft team members in what sounds like a healthy development culture and it's a godamnned masterpiece at every level. Visuals, art direction, story, characters, mechanics, music - it's all stellar.

Some citizen workers who were detained reported only being released from custody after deleting photos and videos of the raid from their phones, said UFW President Teresa Romero in a statement.

I'm sure everything was being done by the numbers.

Knowing how half-assed they've been deploying Grok a ZIP bomb would probably work on it if they allowed file uploads.

From courts legitimately interpreting the law? Not at all.

But that's not a guarantee anymore, and the administration also doesn't care what the courts say. He also just got gigafunding for his Gestapo.

You know all the disgusting child porn in his records they mention as the reason it's not being released? It's not the children in the videos they're concerned about protecting.

By all appearances, he was being allowed to do what he was doing by multiple governments and administrations because he would honeypot and blackmail people on behalf of those governments. And the government is sitting on that blackmail.

If art is good, I'll appreciate it even when the people funding it aren't doing it for the love of art.

I mean.... the movie kinda points that out, too. The exec straight-up changes his tune on the idea of a realistic Barbie when he's told it will sell.

It does a pretty good job of pointing out all aspects of Barbie, good and bad. From female empowerment to consumerism to the objectification of women and the issues surrounding body shaming.

It even calls out the film itself for casting an unrealistically beautiful, successful woman to play Barbie.

Not everyone can live in California wine country.

Most people live where it gets either dangerously hot or dangerously cold for large portions of the year.

Because I live in Texas and being outside in the summer for extended periods is dangerous.

My recent experience with my phone is I tell it to set a 5 minute timer and it sets one in the fucking Google search browser, and if I page away I lose the timer.

Don't research the sequel.

If he's verbally abusive, violent, and keeps you locked up as a prisoner, he isn't necessarily evil.

You can change him! Just be patient, accept him, and love him!

This is a bill to arrest people trying to prevent climate change.

Trump's first impeachment was about withholding military aid from Ukraine. Nothing came of that, and nothing will come of this. Republicans don't care about the law.