cbarrick @ cbarrick @lemmy.world

- [cbarrick.dev](https://cbarrick.dev/)

---

Read more

Posts

5

Comments

505

Joined

2 yr. ago

If you don't want to change the code, try disabling the use-after-free warning from the make call:

        make CFLAGS="-Wno-use-after-free"
  

Why is it?

The code hitting that error is here:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/iwlwifi-fixes.git/tree/tools/lib/subcmd/subcmd-util.h

It looks fine to me.

What you are seeing is a warning that your compiler may have found a use-after-free bug, but I think this is a false positive. Your build is configured to turn this warning into a hard error.

How to fix it?

I think it will be difficult to know how to fix this without knowing more about your build setup. Are you passing any custom CFLAGS? What compiler and version are you using?

Also, here is someone asking about the same issue (in the same code) on Stack Exchange using GGC 12.1:

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/709671/linux-kernel-5-15-54-compilation-errors-with-gcc-12-1

This was the top result when Googling linux "-Werror=use-after-free".

I believe you can disable this warning in this file by adding a pragma after the includes (line 8):

        #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wuse-after-free"


  

See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/925179/selectively-remove-a-warning-message-using-gcc

Edit: If you don't want to change the code, try disabling the use-after-free warning from the make call:

        make CFLAGS="-Wno-use-after-free"
  

This was only a private GOP vote.

For the actual vote on the floor, some reps may still vote for Jordan, e.g. Boebert has said that she will vote for Jordan.

So there's still a chance that these fucktards can't rally enough votes to elect a speaker.

No, that's Gordon Freeman

Relevant links:

https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-43641

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-43641

The error message is about a missing dependency. Try installing package python-aiohttp.

Not sure why Blender needs an HTTP client or why that would cause lag though.

At first I thought the author, Michael Cohen, was the Michael Cohen, which would have made for a very different article.

Why in the world would any American support this chaos?

Like, I'm a progressive and I very much disagree with McCarthy's politics, but there's a lot going on right now and chaos in the house is not productive.

I mean, maybe it's just because McCarthy refused to work across the aisle.

What's the time window?

Like, is this uptime over the past 30d? Over the past year? For all time?

IMO, 30d and 365d are the most useful windows.

So, they're just installing helipads for these weird looking electric helicopters.

Ok.

Damn. Newsweek has sunk so low from their former self.

From the headline, I thought "attacked" meant "assaulted," and that's obviously the connection the editor wanted me to make.

But no, Trump made a disparaging post against this woman on his fake Twitter network. Shitty, but not as bad as the headline implied.

Lol GCP.

When not being a part of the antitrust investigation is an insult.

Scientific computing is cool and all, but why is this posted to the Linux community?

If you live near a University, tune in to the local student radio.

It's usually run by the University without ads.

I rock out to WPTS radio in Pittsburgh and both WUOG and WPPP in Athens, GA.

[Y]ou don't have a specific gravitational field sensor in your body per say.

I'd argue that the vestibular system in your inner ear qualifies as a gravitational field sensor.

impending AGI

AGI is far from impending.

LLMs are generative models. They've learned a distribution to model conversion, and they allow you to sample from that distribution. They aren't "thinking" about what they say. They haven't crossed the syntax-semantics barrier. There is no "general intelligence".

They just feel impressive because humans are language-centric.

Which is incredibly dumb.

Setting aside the damage to the economy and just looking at the politics of it:

• "Republicans hate our troops" is an easy attack. Enlisted service members tend to lean right, and stopping their pay (while still requiring them to work) is going to be a bad look. And all the Dems have to say is "hey look at what the Repubs did to our men and women in uniform." Easy win.
• It's obvious that the Republicans are at fault for the shutdown. And it's obvious that they're not going to get anywhere. They don't have the votes. When we come out of this with a stupid temporary budget, the Repubs will have won nothing and will look even more incompetent.
• It gives the Dems easy talking points, while being difficult to defend by the Repubs. Anyone but Trump would get wrecked in a debate with Biden over this. (Trump never says anything coherent, and no one expects him to, which is a huge benefit in a debate. You simply can't debate him effectively.)

Republicans are shooting themselves in the feet, and it's going to bite them in the ass in the general. It just sucks that this will have lasting repercussions on the economy and the strength of the dollar worldwide...

Weekend at Bernie's Dianne's