Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CB
Posts
5
Comments
505
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • It's frowned upon to editorialize titles. OP reused the title of the article, which is the correct thing to do.

    It's from Vox, an American media company. The URL starts with vox.com/scotus. You should expect American media companies to refer to the SCOTUS as simply "the Supreme Court."

    Just like if I were reading the CBC, I would expect the "Supreme Court" to refer to the Supreme Court of Canada.

  • The former detective and three parlor managers allegedly exploited their employees, [...]

    This is the only sentence with any real meaning in the entire article.

    Sex work is work, and if there is no victim then there is no crime.

    But this single half-sentence claims that the employees were victims, without elaborating further.

    So props if the cops actually helped someone, but if they're just arresting people for prostitution then there are better uses of tax dollars.

  • Note that they dropped TLS 1.3 support

    Switch from wolfssl to mbedtls as default

    [...]

    • TLS 1.3 Support: Users should be aware that mbedtls 2.28 no longer supports TLS 1.3.

    You have to manually setup wolfssl or openssl for TLS 1.3.

  • I use Arch (btw) because of the ArchWiki, and I'm totally comfortable configuring my system how I like it.

    But I do appreciate Debian a lot. You can customize things to almost the same extent, but packages come preconfigured with great defaults and designed to better work together, unlike Arch which uses the upstream defaults almost universally.

  • Nit: It's "à la carte" meaning "by the card" or "according to the menu". Often the accent is dropped in English writing, but it's always written as three words.

    This is just a stupid, meaningless nit-pick. I totally understood what you were saying, so it's really not important. It's just, the more you know, ya know?

  • So realloc(ptr, 1) only happens when !ret && !size i.e. the call failed and size == 0.

    Presumably this is to support a size of zero even when the underlying realloc does not.

    The code is duplicated to try the realloc twice before failing.

    I'm not sure what the use case of zero size is though.