Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CA
Posts
3
Comments
1,570
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Another example for why I absolutely refuse to categorize people by skin color, sex, sexual preference, etc.

    This guy's a fucking piece of shit no matter what color he is.

    Whatdy'a say we judge politicians on their policy rather than immutable attributes?

  • Oh yeah I’m definitely not a carpet expert.

    I meant with a temperament like yours, I can’t imagine why anyone would do you wrong.

    ahem… THE ABOVE SENTENCE IS SARCASM

    Since I you missed it last time I figured you might need a bigger sign.

  • Seeing as these ads will be targeted and of varying length, I wonder if a SponsorBlock-like extension with the ability to accept training data from users to help identify ads.

    The Plex server application has a feature which scrubs videos and identifies intros so you can skip them like you can on Netflix. Wouldn’t it be sort of like that?

    Seems like a good use of AI/ML.

  • I’ve no idea

    I think knowing that these voters base their position on abortion on the belief that it is murder hurts your position so it's better not to answer. Or you just don't know them that well and really have no idea.

    Entirely laughable, which is why nobody has claimed this.

    The argument that these voters' position on abortion (and therefore their votes) are based on race necessarily requires that they are aware of the statistics. If the claim is they vote this way because it disproportionately harms minorities, how do they know it disproportionately harms minorities?

    But I'm glad we agree that they do not know that.

  • So your argument seems to boil down to "it's okay for postal workers to toss things I don't like but not things I like".

    Can you see how this isn't defensible at all?

    This basic premise doesn’t change because of the medium of communication. People shouldn’t be allowed to spread dangerous disinformation via the mail.

    WHO DECIDES what is dangerous disinformation? Your postal workers? I feel like you're not really thinking this through.