It's Lemmy, the sentence "and why I blame Elon Musk" is basically the unspoken rule of everything.
Now don't get me wrong, he's a POS businessman just trying to manipulate the market into a profit for himself, but if there's no reasonable way to blame him for something and it seems like you're just going "thanks Obama!" It's getting old.
That's the biggest problem, can't even get straight data and ads separately. Now the articles are the ads, and SEO/adspace has made search results even less useful.
Generally speaking all of the climate change deniers that I'm familiar with in everyday life, they have fully transitioned from "its not happening" to "its happening but doesnt matter because (pick one) A. It's just a sign of the end times of my religion. B. It's just a cycle and there's nothing we did to cause it or can do to stop it.
Once again the goal posts get shifted and we see them admit to something and then fall on yet another reason why we shouldn't concern ourselves due to the real reason that they just don't give a shit.
Anti cheat is the biggest obstacle now, can't overcome that and if you and your friends enjoy playing together on a game that doesn't support it then you're SoL. Unfortunately only 75% or so of the games my friend group plays are compatible.
So there were no weapons and munitions on this ship? No drones or explosives? Just innocent little airplane engines?
I don't give a shit about Israel, but pretending that supplying the enemy war machine with weapons can be classified as civilian because of the ship you're putting those weapons on is a farce.
I would absolutely expect those groups to attack weapons shipments, why the fuck wouldn't they? Also, attack? Two Navy Seals sent in to sieze control and you want to pretend that's the same thing as bombarding a ship with explosives? Lol fucking biased as shit. Guarantee if they'd been successful you'd see fewer civilian casualties than any operation performed by Hamas or Islamic Jihad.
I've seen it as well in my IT department, which is ironic since the whole argument for automation and jobs from capitalists is that "the economy will shift and there will be more jobs in repair and maintenance of robotics!" Etc.
Yeah, unless you're unwilling to actually expand those jobs at all, in which case we will just end up with a bunch of malfunctioning systems piled on top of technical debt.
The key is to set up that support system, not to try and stall the march of technology. If we did that we'd still have milk men and dozens of farm hands per square acre.
I recently reread "Beyond this Horizon" by Heinlein, after reading "Progress and Poverty" by Henry George. I had no idea at the time how much RAH was pulling from Georgian political economy while simultaneously writing about a future where 95%+ is fully automated and has only high level human oversight. That's the kind of forward thinking we desperately needed during the early 1900's, and are now in a state of emergency over. He refers to our current model as "Pseudo-capitalism" and illustrates in the first conversation of the novel how automated capitalism and collectivism are functionally only "culturally relevant" since the automated capitalist model of the novel includes a UBI and most of the basic needs of society are met for free. He then explains that even purely socialist societies still require some system of finance externally and therefore a requirement of internal financial tracking and accounting. Thus both societies are fundamentally the same in practice despite their ideological differences.
He's most famous for ideas like "TANSTAAFL" but he also ideated much more progressive societies that people don't talk much about if they've even heard of them.
They'd prefer to learn nothing, blame the OS for not looking and operating exactly like Linux, and then claim it sucks not for the reasons it sucks but because they can't be bothered to try.
Where would that come from? According to a posted article in this thread thermal energy can't transfer either unless by direct connection and radiation would be the biggest factor, with increasing size compared to on the surface due to lack of atmosphere "attenuating" the distance it travels.
Oh good, he has too many upvotes for me to assume but I figured.
It's such a shame, you'd think these communities would be about how advancement is always good due to it unlocking new possibilities. For example, maybe this aircraft will open up doors in hypersonic flight that could be used to make more efficient SSTO model and get us less dependent on fossil fuels for chemical rockets via traditional means. Or allows materials science to make a leap forward that revolutionizes fusion.
To just say "why are we doing this?" Is an absolutely insane perspective for R&D and a fundamental misunderstanding of the way we develop technologies.
It's more like middle school pickup versus an NFL starting lineup.