Microsoft and Activision Blizzard are both American companies so what standing does the UK's CMA have to block this? The article doesn't mention it at all
Sorry I would love this to be true but this is just PR bollocks isn't it?
The claim: "Millions of workers will have a say over their working patterns".
The reality: "If a worker’s existing working pattern [...], they will be able to make a formal application to change their working pattern [...]. Once a worker has made their request, their employer will be required to notify them of their decision within one month.".
So you have the right to ask (as if you didn't already), and your employer has to respond within a month (but they can still just say "no"). What am I missing here?
I think it's common knowledge that they recommended this back in about 2009, and I think the government notoriously sacked their own scientific advisor rather than listen to reason, perhaps it's a new leak that it was recommended again in 2016? (Although not at all surprising that they did so!)
Honestly I'd be more surprised if the government managed to find someone with any kind of scientific standing willing to say criminalisation is a good idea
Here are the 10 recommendations (there's a lot of text surrounding these explaining and justifying them which I've trimmed out):
A1) the Government consider
the introduction of escalating penalties for repeat
traffic offences.
A2) the Government seek consistency
by requiring re-testing for anyone wishing to drive
following any period of disqualification.
A3a) the Government increase the
maximum sentence for dangerous driving to four
years.
A3b) the National Police Chiefs’ Council
(NPCC) guide police forces to bail drivers whom
they arrest for dangerous driving with a condition
not to drive.
A4) the Sentencing Council revisit its 2020 guidance on the totting-up disqualification, to reinforce that
exceptional hardship should only be granted in
truly exceptional circumstances.
A5) tolerances in the enforcement of speeding be removed.
B1) the development of guidance based on best practice, with the intention that it is adopted as widely as possible by Police forces.
B2) the implementation of a standardised
system across police forces for submission and
processing of third-party reporting, based on best
practice and supported by adequate resourcing.
B3) the Government appoint a UK Commissioner for
Road-Danger Reduction.
B4) Police and Crime Commissioners should consider all crash victims as victims of crime.
B5) the Government launch a very extensive and ongoing communications campaign designed
to increase greatly both understanding of and
compliance with the changes
I appreciate the concerns around body-image and especially consent are important ones. Nonetheless I find it slightly odd that an article about how happiness has declined since specifically 2009 doesn't mention the 13 years of Tory rule and austerity we've had in that time.
Basically it sounds like an utter fucking shit show for something so safety critical, and the report from NATS unsurprisingly but disappointingly tries to spin it as positively as possible
Headline is a bit misleading imo, "military truck" sounds like a truck owned and operated by the MOD, not a former military truck that is now owned by some weirdo
"This whole thing has broken her,” Mary’s sister said. “She has expressed suicidal thoughts. She cries daily. She does not sleep. She is really fearful.”
There was a story recently about all the sexual abuse by guards at HMP Berwyn. I don't have a source to hand but I think there have been 6 suicides and a murder just this year at HMP Bristol. So it doesn't surprise me that much.
Meanwhile what are the Conservative's priorities? Making offenders attend sentencing. And making possession of laughing gas illegal - so we can waste more police time and send more people to prison over something that doesn't matter at all.
"There will be exemptions for legitimate uses of nitrous oxide"
Legitimate just means legal so this sentence is saying it will be legal to use it in a legal way... Pretty stupid
My understanding is the whole court system has like a multi-year backlog. Forcing offenders to be present for sentencing seems like a complete non-issue and in fact a distraction when compared to this much greater impediment to justice
I don't like seeing this guy's dumb ugly face even in memes making fun of him. Bad vibes weirdo