Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BU
Posts
10
Comments
282
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • It may be operating at a loss so they can control the market, but that doesn't make much sense at this point. There just isn't active competition.

    Certifying the Dragons to fly 5+ times must help.

    Now that I'm looking at this, Resilience, which flew Inspiration4 with a dome instead of docking adapter, hasn't flown again. Hmm.

  • The turnaround time to identify the problem, propose and test a fix, and return to flight is just unmatched.

    You could argue that it should never have happened, either because of process or design, but I guess a quality escape like this was inevitable with how many of these they make and fly.

  • That would be a crazy flex if they pulled it off, compared to entire companies focusing on RPO like Astroscale with their current demo mission and True Anomaly with their failed attempted RPO mission.

    That being said, I doubt that any Starlink engineering cameras would be good enough to give them better views than the 2nd stage's onboard cameras, and Starlink prop systems don't look like they have enough thrusters or control authority for that kind of thing.

  • I think the value proposition is more about national pride and security, so they can keep launching things if they have a falling out with other countries. Like when Russia decided to start a war and take Oneweb satellites hostage. Imagine a world where the US elected a crazy nationalist who wanted out of NATO...