bouh @ bouh @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

968

Joined

2 yr. ago

What the fuck is this comparison? You compare a level 7 character to a lvl4 now? How crazy are you?

If your enemy lives through 10 turns under heat metal you're not really fighting it... Your assumptions are so delusional it's hilarious.

This is wrong. It is as mislead as the people you are referring to.

Religion is merely an organised idealogy around practices. Political parties can be considered religions. Your atheism and the thesis in this thread can be considered religions. How do you make the difference?

I know the spell. I told you. Two attacks with a longsword from one hand will do more damage than that. I'm talking about a bland longsword and no ability whatsoever on top.

On average, an ability modifier of +4 is about a d8, and +5 is about a d10. 2 longsword attacks make 4d8. 2 2hander attacks make about 5d8. That's without any resource invested.

You're telling me that your awesome spell requires a lvl4 spell slot that you have 2 in the day to do less than any lvl5 martial would do without expanding any resources. And you need your enemy specifically to wear a metal armor, or your spell does about nothing.

Extremist atheist who want to murder people because of their religion are as bad as religious people who want the same.

Fascism is not built on religion, yet it's the fiercest opponent of science and tolerancy. It's also the fiercest fighter of truth, and the biggest spreader of fake news and lies.

Fascism doesn't care about religion, religion is merely an ally of circumstance for them.

Atheist who lean to fascism in order to fight religions are as bad as the worst zealots there are. Fascism is not a solution to anything, it is the enemy.

Fascism is the enemy, not religion. Learn the difference. Or you'll merely spread a godless religion with the same zeal as those you are fighting.

What could go wrong if a class with the most hp and that halves the incoming damage also had extreme AC naked?

In the case of heat metal the better effect is the disadvantage it gives to the victim. 4d8 is not much. A lvl5 martial does this with a rusty one handed weapon, without a spell slot, two less levels, and I resource whatsoever.

And then most lvl4 spells are much more powerful or much more useful.

Multiclassing before lvl5 is usually a bad idea. You can twist the problem how you like, that's how the game is designed.

Take a paladin 4/fithter 3, and any smite will do much, much more than your heat metal. A champion 3/berzerker 4 (you must be really stupid to do that) will still do much, much more than your heat metal. And he will be able to do it as many time as you will.

Violence can be justified, especially to prevent or answer violence.

But the target of the violence matters a lot. Violence against people who have nothing to do with the problem is never justified.

Rebelling against violent police is perfectly justified. Rebelling against a terrorist state that commit atrocities is perfectly justified. All out war against a invader is perfectly justified.

Killing civilians, murdering civilians and taking them postage is not ever justified. This is either war crime or terrorism.

Spellcaster doesn't get spell of higher level in this case, only spellslot. A martial still get the proficiency up.

Crit fail and success for skill checks is a variant rule in the dmg (maybe even discussed in the PHB)

Uranium is like 5% of the price of nuclear electricity.

What I see here is that Germany is still burning fossile fuels to produce more than half its energy. And even more so during winter. Good job Germany. Do you want a medal?

How long has Germany been building renewables? For what result? It is pitiful a'd German ecologist should be ashamed of themselves.

Germany too the wrong fight. Nuclear is not the threat, fossile fuels are. But keep convincing yourself you did nothing wrong while the world is burning. Hopefully in 50 years you'll stop burning fossile fuels.

What's the worst that can happen?

Partly I think. I'm no expert. But after ww2 the US and USSR split the world between eachother, so with Israel the US had an opportunity for a vassal in this area. And politicaly the Jews being harassed everywhere through all of history made its case to give them a part of land.

I think that the area was a colony at the time, so it was easier for the west to give a land it doesn't care much about.

The kurdes would like a solution like this these days I think. But given today's context their chance is slim.

What liberation will there be here? Do you expect the hamas to win anything against Israel? They would fight actual military targets if they could win anything.

Can you tell what this show of violence from the hamas will bring to Palestine? What will Palestine earn from this?

I'm all for fighting oppression. But I'm skeptical of sacrificing people for nothing.

Yes Israel is a fascist and terrorist country. And the US are hypocrite to support them. That being said, will a shower of rockets on civilians change any of that? No, on the contrary.

If any, Israel is the only one that will win from this new war.

And support terrorism? Tell me how will these large scale attack make life better for Palestinians?

Oh and I must provide this example : anciant Egypt culturally absorbed many invaders despite losing to them. The only changes were the name of the dynasty. This proves that sometimes even a hostile invader can integrate itself in your culture.

Yes. And ultimately that's what the racists are afraid of. But it's not year 1500 anymore. The "natives" now have armies and weapons no one can challenge.

It doesn't change the matter : countries that flourish have a high immigration. It is both because they are flourishing and because they have the influx of people to do so.

The irony is that success fuels success and decline fuels decline, yet people are fighting tooth and nails to keep declining because they fear the decline.

Israel bombed some building in Palestine. The whole towers were flattened. That's a war crime. Just because you do it with a fighter jet doesn't make it more humane.

The apartheid is also a slow murder. I'd be interested to see statistics for all the people who died because of the blocus and the apartheid.

Yet if you're not part of the conflict there's no reason to support one side over the other.