bob_omb_battlefield @ bob_omb_battlefield @sh.itjust.works

Posts

1

Comments

75

Joined

2 yr. ago

Yeah, I guess the debate is which is the lesser evil. I didn't make the original comment but I think this is what they were getting at.

If you aren't allowed to freely use data for training without a license, then the fear is that only large companies will own enough works or be able to afford licenses to train models.

Cool, thanks.

Do phones actually cost $35?

If you order from Best Buy then presumably your contract is with them and not Door Dash. Though I guess you need to check the T's and C's to know what you agreed to...

Can be good experience to move away from home for a bit...

Since it's processed on device they don't (necessarily) need to transmit and store your conversations in some central location. I guess theoretically this could be done in a secure way.

Tape

*digital license agreements

I think you need a forest, a pulp mill, and a paper mill. The forest might be the hardest part in a lot of places...

It will still need to pass city inspections as part of the building permit process...

We can save shingles if we stop vaccinating now!

Glaciers are there year round.

Does getting ready to click on something count at user input?

But Tesla is not brake by wire like that. The brake pedal is connected directly to the hydraulic system, right?

Haul trucks in mines.

Whether or not something has tariffs depends on the type of good and where it is from. Overall it's a complicated system. But we've had free trade in North America for a while now which is why there haven't been tariffs between Canada and the US.

I don't think you are allowed to sell patent infringing products, even if you didn't make them. The manufacturers may not be in the US so going after them could be more complex. I believe patents restrict rights to make, use, or sell.

The leaves must blow.

I think my company uses software from Cyberark to do this sort of thing.