Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
977
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • This just lets me know yall dont have a leg to stand on anymore.

  • I dont recall any other election where people are saying 'look, you cant expect to have candidates that dont support genocide'

  • Nah im not gonna accept genocide as a given

  • Yes, i explained them doing it. Its not a matter of figuring out, its fighting against the corruption of the party currently in power employing all the anti-competitive tactics they can. That only happens when they have enough support to win that fight. Free will exists and they cant force you to not support the side that is fighting to keep competition off the ballots. Only hope that people support democracy.

  • Youve got it backwards

    “If you say that someone has said something, but not in so many words, you mean that they said it or expressed it, but in a very indirect way.”

    Scroll down for the inverse

    in so many words in American English in unequivocal terms; explicitly She told them in so many words to get out

  • Democrats supporting a genocide is whats gonna do it.

  • This shit is so disjointed. Its not a genocide, its only a genocide because the countrys leaders want it to be, Biden is only arming a genocide because those leaders want to use the weapons for genocide. You're stuck, man, you cant get past any of the uncomfortable truths. You cant make an argument that its not a genocide. You cant make an argument that our government is not arming and funding that genocide. You cant make an argument that youre not supporting a candidate that is likely to continue to arm and fund that genocide.

  • Ill give you a hint, theyre banned by the same people for the same reason third parties get banned from participating in democracy.

  • Genocide is an absolute non starter. If one party supports it and one supports it harder, you need to burn down the whole political field and start over.

  • A lot better than a vote that goes into bombs dropped on gaza.

  • Nah im voting for a candidate that has not voted to arm and fund an ongoing genocide.

  • "Yes he is" does. Im sorry but the headlines youve been given are an outright lie this time

  • but without some kind of ranked choice voting

    This is a really big sticking point for me. People always support it here, but always bring it up with no expectation of, you know, making it happen. I too want ranked choice voting, and when I say that I mean I am earnestly trying to make it happen, and it happens when we elect people that support it, like Jill. Its astounding how much she supports what people here want, but people here just despise her, making up all kinds of shit.

  • Theres a lot of ignorance here. She doesnt show up once every four years, you assume that because you only hear about her once every four years. She's not as active, understandably, on non-election years, but is still doing political work and promoting her party and giving talks.

    Yes, the secretary of state gave them the wrong forms and guidance, and the courts are banning a political party from an election on a technicality against the spirit of the law.

  • It...is when the question is literally "is putin a war criminal?"

  • I wish it meant we did nothing for palestine. Instead of it meaning bombs and funding continues to pour into the arms of the country thats killing them.