blackbelt352 @ blackbelt352 @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

450

Joined

2 yr. ago

That's just how language works. It changes and morphs as time goes on and culture leaders change. And in my last, idk 20 or so years on the internet I've never really seen the word suspension used. It's always been temp ban, ban or permaban.

And what's to stop people from still saying "I got banned" even when it's called a suspension?

This feels a lot like the "We have 15 different cable standards, let's make a universal one!" creates new cable standard "We have 16 different cable standards now..." situation.

Even if the language we currently use is slightly ambiguous, one or two questions clears up the ambiguity and still gets across the idea of "I can't post right now." And comparatively asking an extra question sounds a lot easier than reworking something culturally ingrained in our lexicon.

I won't burn them theatrically but I'll let ones I don't particularly want to keep around quietly just fall into disuse. The bridge is still there but Id have no intention to reaching out across it any time soon. Once in a while people do change over time, sometimes they mellow out or realize they fucked up. A disused bridge is easier just easier to deal with than a burned bridge.

Good bridges aren't about pretending things are sweet and dandy, good bridges are honest communication and connection, burning them means passing people off on the other end and pissed people are more likely to retaliate. People who feel mostly neutral or a bit annoyed don't retaliate.

When you leave, wherever you're working be honest but professional. Say you felt your coworkers didn't value your time and work you did and at times their unprofessional behavior impacted your ability to work. Don't name names, don't finger point, but be honest with what dissatisfied you. If you have an at least neutral professional relationship with your manager maybe they could be a reference for future employers.

Online there's basically 3 levels of ban, temp ban, ban, and permaban.

Temp ban, the offender is not allowed to interact temporarily usually for a set amount of time before its automatically lifted, they get put in timeout for a bit.

Ban, more permanent sibling of the temp ban, doesn't automatically lift after a set amount of time, can be lifted manually by admin/mods, usually leaves one possible channel of comms open for the offender to make appeals to the admins/mods. They've been kicked out of the bar, they're not allowed back, but maybe in a while management will soften their stance.

Permaban, you do not pass go, you do not collect 200, you're permanently gone, no take backs, these are basically never undone and basically no one except for the highest level of admins can undo it. You dun fucked up, the bar's management is beyond pissed at you and you will never ever be back again, bouncers have your photo and it is damn near on sight with them.

It seems like most people conflate temp ban and regular ban. They're both pretty common and the difference between them is basically one has an automatic timer so calling something a ban, temporary or regular just gets called a ban.

We're stuck between an overabundance of constant "elon musk said this concerning thing" reporting on his every move because that brings in ad revenue but not hearing about his might be worse because he's basically operating without any kind of spotlight on him.

God what profit seeking and media consolidation has done to journalism, and our collective faith in journalists is an atrocity.

Correction, that's not how reality works in terms of voting systems, you'd be surprised just how few people actually understand how voting systems work and why different voting systems break down in various ways and the greatest mathematicians for the last 150+ years have not devised a perfect voting system.

But at this point, you took my conclusion about how the reality of voting systems break down and strawmanned it implying people already know government is corrupt.

At this point, we get to make a lengthy explanation about First Past the Post always leading to a 2 party system because of the spoiler effect, we get to a lengthy history explanation about how the (at the time) progressive republican party won the election with Abraham Lincoln because the (at the time) conservative Democrat party split into Dixiecrats in favor of slavery and northern Democrats who didn't care either way and the Whig party just up and died in 1850 and that's the only way a 3rd party becomes viable in FPTP. And then we just argue back and forth of "well if people just spontaneously saw things the way I do they would vote third party too!" to "That's not how reality works."

One point of clarification after I say there were people who just didn't vote, I also intended to say add Republicans launched several purges of voter registrations that tended to hit anyone further to the left of them and employed every voter suppression tactic in the book to depress Democrat voter turnout.

I think Dems lost because a some of missteps along the way and some external factors. I think Biden should have said he wasn't running again sooner, there should have been a proper primary, there needed to be even more of a focus on economic populism and making actual progress, not just trying to maintain the status quo. There were a lot of people who just didn't vote. And then Republicans

At the end of the day, the only people who have an opinion about Palestine are politically engaged leftists who want to see the genocide stop and anyone watching Fox News who wants Israel to win. For the rest of America unfortunately, it doesn't matter to them. That's a fight happening halfway around the world between 2 nations that aren't us.

I would have loved to see a peaceful end to the conflict, but that's wasn't going to realistically happen either way, but I would much preferred to see as little escalation as possible, and trump is nothing but escalation.

So again, we punished democrats in the way democracy punishes people who actually believe in democratic processes and let republicans who don't give 2 shits about democratic processes get to run rampant in the government. Good. Fucking. Job.

That seems to be the end goal...

Reducing all kinds of violence to the same Violence(tm) does nothing to address the myriad ways that different kinds of violence happen. All these different kinds of violence makes each kind of violence more manageable that trying to stop Violence(tm). Focusing on different kinds of violence let's us allocate resources and attention and research toward dealing with it.

A domestic assault is a much different kind of violence to 2 drunk guys fighting it out to a mobster telling his underlings to "take someone out." All of these things need/have different things to handle them. Shelters for domestic abuse creates somewhere safe to go, bouncers will break up a fight and kick the brawlers out, for organized crime there RICO legislation.

Stopping All Violence(tm) is too big of a task for any one person or organization to handle.

I don't like violence either, so much of it leads to unnecessary loss of life and limb and innocent bystanders get caught in the crossfire. But lumping all together into Violence(tm) brings us no closer to resolving conflicts before the start or helping people when things do go wrongf

If more people had made more noise when Biden continually violated the Leahy Law and circumvented Congress to provide arms to an ongoing genocide... We had a chance to fix the system. To hold him accountable and make sure no matter who was the next president, they'd also be able to be held accountable.

Citizens did make noise, citizens did point out that he violated Leahy Law, and the way to hold politicians accountable in a democracy is getting them out of office and away from the levers of power. Well here we are, Biden and Dems are going out of office and the genocide is going to be actively being accelerated by the Trump administration gleefully flooding Israel with more weapons "cleanse" Gaza so they can build their gaudy hotels and fulfill some Book of Revelations prophesy because the republican party is absolutely flooded with Dominionists.

Good. Fucking. Job.

It's a lot. Like a lot a lot. GPUs have about 150 billion transistors but those transistors only make 1 connection in what is essentially printed in a 2d space on silicon.

Each neuron makes dozens of connections, and there's on the order of almost 100 billion neurons in a blobby lump of fat and neurons that takes up 3d space. And then combine the fact that multiple neurons in patterns firing is how everything actually functions and you have such absurdly high number of potential for how powerful human brains are.

At this point, I'm not sure there's enough gpus in the world to mimic what a human brain can do.

Not just hamlet but the entire body of works accredited to Shakespeare

You need to work on your reading comprehension. I am primarily pinning it on the algorithm but I'm also pointing out that Rogan's podcast is leading people to right-wing commentators, partly because of the guests he has on and partly because the algorithms push people in that direction.

Got a source on those policy positions to back that up? Any politicians that explicitly are running on encouraging 3rd trimester abortions?

Congratulations you've pointed out the obvious they're douchebags who lean further right than rogan, it doesn't change the fact that algorithms have linked Rogan with these douchebags.

Don't fight against them, expose the sources of funding they get and go after the money. Almost immediately after Tenet was found out to be a Russian front paying for and delivering talking points to Podcaster like Tim Pool, Lauren Southern, etc and was shut down. All these shows suddenly started dropping what they could do because they lost a significant source of funding and content.

you have to support free home delivery of abortion meds via text message, elective abortion into the third trimester...

Where in any Democrat aligned policy us this the case? The only people getting late term abortions are people who've had something catastrophic happen during their pregnancy. No person is going through 6+ months of all the challenges and difficulties associated with pregnancy just to decide they don't want a baby at the very end.

Don't just parrot what you hear off of Fox News or Breitbart or Daily Wire, look shit up and verify what they're saying is true.