Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BI
Posts
2
Comments
189
Joined
10 mo. ago

Permanently Deleted

Jump
  • Hey that's not fair, they recently added tabs to their file explore. I mean sure it has a shared history, so if you open a new tab and navigate, then return to the previous tab back takes to you their useless 'home screen', but still, there are tabs kinda!

  • What about this, instead we just take that 1.5 mill a year and put it towards things that actual solve problems, rather than making sure we have the best and brights super soldiers doing traffic stops and taking notes on your break in.

  • Electoralism in this context means the idea that elections are the solutions to the political issues of our time, that the primary focus of energy from the left should be in winning elections so the elected officials can do as they were selected to do and solve societal ills.

    Many Marxists and other leftists ideologies disagree and feel that the four options you've given show that electoralism is a trap for the political energy to change.

  • That's a valid concern, and it seems much of the function of the fediverse only exists because it's not worth treating it too maliciously. I guess the question how could one combat that?

  • How much active development does a browser engine need? If Mozilla died would I quickly be finding a larger chunk of websites that aren't supported? Because as it sits, Firefox feels like one of the most corporate pieces of open source software I use daily, and I need to know just how tragic it would be if Mozilla died.

  • Really it’s actually that businesses with that structure tend to perform better in a market economy

    Yes dumping industrial waste into the town water ways, buying up all competition, off-shoring labor, and paying employees as little as they can get away with, are all well incentivized market systems.

    Individual business being allowed to be cooperatively owned does not equate an economy where individual ownership of the means of production is disallowed. And as every facet of society seems to being increasingly enshitified while we barrel towards climate collapse, I don't really feel the need to argue that strict market only economic systems are fundamentally flawed and have outlived their use.

  • Mostly because it's dependent on who told you "Comunism is a flavor of old-world authoritarianism, based upon the idea that mankind is incapable of choosing the right thing, so the right choice is instead mandated by law."

    A good working definition of the ideas of communism is democracy of the work place and the economy. As it stands work places are dictatorships run by bosses that effectively have unilateral control over all choices of the company. Socialism and communism are built on the idea since workers are the ones actually doing the work that make the money and bare the brunt of the choices, they should be the ones making the choices.

    Really it's actually capitalism that supposes people are too dumb to make their own choices or know how a business is run, and thus shouldn't have say over company choices.

  • Fediverse @lemmy.world

    Matrix 2.0 Is Here!

    Technology @lemmy.world

    Matrix 2.0 Is Here!