berno @ berno @lemmy.world

Posts

4

Comments

87

Joined

2 yr. ago

VoTe BlUe No MaTtEr WhO!! 🙄

ChatGPT ass reply bro touch grass

Well ACKSHULLY wanting common sense solutions is right wing coded!

Another 10 years of losses for you friend, gl. The vibe has been altered, these dipshit takes are going to deliver conservative rule for the next generation.

Schwarzenegger was good for environmental issues in California, and RFK Jr played a part in that as well

One has to have a high IQ to like Rick and Morty ass post

"Want to go rightwards" - are you fucking high?

People want common sense approaches to social problems. The party stabbed Bernie Sanders twice in a row after shitting themselves because he was going to win the Democratic primary.

More people I know who voted for Trump like and respect Sanders more than any other Dem candidate in the last decade because he's authentic and true to himself and his beliefs. They don't think his proposed solutions are going to work, but they're willing to have a conversation and meet in the middle. The all or nothing ideologues running the Dems right now have no fucking idea what they're doing, they're trashing the joint - whether by malice or idiocy is moot at this point. Get these people OUT

Bias was baked in via RLHF and also existed in the datasets used for training. Reddit cancer grows

Flatpaks suck

Ubuntu has turned to dogshit

Learn

Dems are cooked. Nobody is buying the old guard bullshit anymore. Embrace populism or go the way of the Whigs

Racist

Here's why your election fraud theory falls apart:

1. You claim "statistical anomalies" but provide zero actual statistics or verifiable data whatsoever.
2. You make a false comparison to "Putin's referendum" without any supporting analysis
3. You rely on personal disbelief rather than evidence ("no way the nation...")
4. You misrepresent how election audit systems actually work
5. You suggest Elon Musk has a conspiracy with vote machines without citing any credible source
6. You take alleged quotes completely out of context or possibly just make them up
7. You reference this "ETA website" without establishing its credibility
8. You use the classic "where there's smoke" fallacy to justify conspiracy thinking
9. You contradict yourself by dismissing past election fraud claims while using identical reasoning
10. You make a dramatic leap to "Democracy is over" without logical foundation

If you're going to claim election fraud, you need actual evidence, not just feelings and misrepresented quotes.

Sounds like election denial and a whole lotta conspiracy to me. This kind of stuff has long roots, I'm not sure if you're familiar with the Diebold voting machine hack stuff that was floating around the web about 2 decades ago but this seems like more of the same kinda unfounded cope from people who can't accept they lost in a free and fair election.

Basically, prove it or shut the fuck up. You're not adding anything to the conversation besides FUD.

Meds now

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/04/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-declares-national-emergency-to-increase-our-competitive-edge-protect-our-sovereignty-and-strengthen-our-national-and-economic-security/

• Some goods will not be subject to the Reciprocal Tariff. These include: (1) articles subject to 50 USC 1702(b); (2) steel/aluminum articles and autos/auto parts already subject to Section 232 tariffs; (3) copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and lumber articles; (4) all articles that may become subject to future Section 232 tariffs; (5) bullion; and (6) energy and other certain minerals that are not available in the United States.