Basically "does this JSON object contain at least these two properties, and is the value of one particular properties a string of digits followed by the letter 'Z'", for example.
I often wonder about the stuff I write, what becomes of it. It's a little disheartening since I love crafting it for best effect... But especially with computer books for beginners, people prefer to ask AI for the answers instead of studying.
I also just bought 6 sci-fi books from an author I'd never heard of for cheap. I love supporting indy authors, the price was right, and they sold their books directly from the website, no middlemen and no DRM. Perfect.
But was the author real? I actually did a bunch of research to find out their history and all that before pulling the trigger. I really don't want to read AI stories. But I can see a future where the vast majority don't care. Imagine an endless episode of Survivor or a soap opera, completely generated 24x7 forever. You know that shit would be massive.
And there might only be a fringe that seeks human-generated content for the humanity of it.
A trick you can use there is to form the connection with different intent, e.g. to learn more about the field. Maybe it leads to something and maybe it doesn't, but at least you learned something.
Yeah, we computer people don't typically count networking as a forté. But I fear that while before the network was merely important, now it could turn into the only thing that matters.
Vim because it's ubiquitous, starts up instantly, works when ssh'd into a server, and doesn't get in my way with lots of busy interface. Also modal editors are the only way to go, IMHO. 🙂
This is pretty much the only way to verify knowledge. And it's kind of what interviewers do when they're thinking about hiring someone for a job, right? Same goal.
One potential avenue that schools have, especially in college, is to let the students know that. You're not up against the school; you're up against the interviewer.
This academic year I'm going to try to set up a thing where we do mock interviews with students, hopefully with real interviewers from real companies. I want to show the students where they're going, and what they really have to get ready for.
In my dream world, we wouldn't even have grades or diplomas. After all, when we're learning things on our own we don't have those and yet somehow we manage to get the job done. But not having grades comes with its own set of problems in this academic structure we've set up.
This guy's argument is that he's a 10xer because he's using AI effectively, i.e. just proofreading its output and deleting the comments. (Also, why hire juniors when you can get the same work for $20/mo?)
I think this is a losing strategy unless all senior devs never retire and are immortal. (Or unless GAI happens in which case the world economy will collapse and who cares about strategy.)
It looks like what's happening is that way fewer companies are willing to invest in juniors now, leading to falling enrollment in university, leading to a shortage of seniors, leading to very high dev pay, leading to increased enrollment. Eventually.
Basically "does this JSON object contain at least these two properties, and is the value of one particular properties a string of digits followed by the letter 'Z'", for example.