It's also funny that a tax meant to increase gas prices and make it easier for alternatives to be cost effective is used in an argument to not do anything and just rely on Russian gas.
Though it would be good/required if that tax directly goes to the country paying it and to efforts to switch from gas. That's sort of how the Netherlands subsidises the efforts, they made electricity and gas more expensive and used part of that to subsidize solar panels, various business projects, etc.
If the issue is caused by rust not escaping arguments
That Windows API is terrible. There isn't a way to have the escaping done for you. Further, there is not an API where you do not need to do the escaping. There is no documentation on what kind of escaping is needed.
If you wire things, use keystones. I didn't know that standard. Makes it much easier to have ethernet. My house had non standard keystone type things. Those are sort expensive, I replaced them with keystones just not have to deal with anything other than keystones in future.
Registered Republicans still significantly outnumber registered Democrats
Aren't there loads of cases of removing voters from being able to vote? Further, dividing areas of voters in such a way that it isn't about getting the majority of the votes.
The bad thing isn't caused by the one doing bad things, it's by others not doing enough to stop them. Interesting way to argue and to ignore responsibility.
This hinges on New York’s laws regarding surety bonds
But that's exactly the issue. The bond company is pretending that they don't have to follow any law/regulation because they're out of state. While AG is objecting based upon the NY law regarding the bond.
Meaning, need to show financials. Need to have enough assets. The AG said that their assets are lower than the bond amount. While the bond should be 10% of the assets at most.
The bond company added the financials of another company that's not involved with the bond. Pretty shady behaviour.
Meaning, apparently the company can only vouch for a bond that's up to 10% of its assets. The company isn't big enough to vouch for this bond. In the financials they added another company to pretend they're big enough, but that company isn't legally involved with the bond. So pretty dishonest at best to add an unrelated company.
Worldwide maritime laws are a fucking byzantine hot mess
So many comments early on argued on what would be somewhat logical. While Maritime law to me seems anything but logical. I like your summary of those laws!
But that doesn't get rid of the ads, it just get rid of some. Sponsorblock would still be needed. Why pay a huge amount for something ineffective?