If this bill fails we should all go long water and opt for physical delivery instead of cash settlement.
"Yes, seller of water futures, you have to deliver 800,000 cubic feet of water to my house. That's derivatives bruh!"
Seriously you have to talk to these finance bozos in the only language they understand- money. For some reason, "people need water (and housing etc.) to live" just doesn't get through to them.
Crazy that the proposed solution to propaganda is banning media instead of investing in education that promotes critical thinking. Or maybe the idea here is "no propaganda except mine".
Yea, their argument boils down to "well Hamas so they deserve it, it's their own fault". Incredibly apathetic and cruel. Tbf people who think like that are also victims of something truly fucked up in their lives, but they are wrong and Israel is wrong to do this. Full stop.
You can just support international law, you don't have to choose between Israel and Iran. Embassies are considered soverign soil of the nation they represent and so bombing an embassy is a direct attack on another country. When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022 they got sanctioned by the international community. There are plenty of other examples in recent history of consequences for aggression. The only question is why is Israel exempt from consequences that apply to other countries? That's what this false dichotomy (Israel vs. Iran/Hamas/Hezbollah etc.) is trying to mask- instead of asking why Israel is exempt from legal consequences it changes the dialogue to "if you don't support Israel then you support terrorism" and thereby nullifies international law since the law is applied selectively.
Lots of false equivalances related to this war but being against Israel bombing an embassy in another country is not the same as supporting Iran. You don't have to choose between Israel and Iran, you have to choose between Israel and international law / human rights.
Phrasing it as "if you don't support Israel then you support Iran (or Hamas, Hezbolla etc.)" is to disregard the importance of international law and the fact that it applies to everyone.
Taxes in theory reduce consumption because the price increases, like the 25% tax on Chinese EVs levied by the U.S. to protect... the fossil fuel industry.
Yea, and why would Palestine have to "negotiate statehood with Israel before" getting statehood?
And what was the U.N. partition plan for Palestine in 1947, didn't it make a Jewish state and an Arab state? Does this mean Israel also doesn't have statehood? It's fucked up yea but it also makes no sense if you're not racist.
bartolomeo @ bartolomeo @suppo.fi Posts 16Comments 976Joined 2 yr. ago
If this bill fails we should all go long water and opt for physical delivery instead of cash settlement.
"Yes, seller of water futures, you have to deliver 800,000 cubic feet of water to my house. That's derivatives bruh!"
Seriously you have to talk to these finance bozos in the only language they understand- money. For some reason, "people need water (and housing etc.) to live" just doesn't get through to them.