balls_expert @ balls_expert @lemmy.blahaj.zone

Posts

23

Comments

197

Joined

2 yr. ago

The user base boost means lemmy will very likely be viable next time there's a major fuck up and people go look for alternatives

If it happens they might start losing speed

Long term it gave a kick off boost to many alternatives, one of which is bound to grow viable

That forest is built like an american city the way its missing its middle

All the same size!

Forests need to have old trees, young trees, bushes, fallen over trees, ...!

The original local fauna couldn't live in these!

The arc has been posted in not the straightest order, but we got there

You gonna use racism to push towards republican viewpoints?

And a big bowl of FARTS at 9pm

Oh shit you made a sequel

Lung cancer

I call it black cat :)

he was born in britain

Goblin breeding!

Call me greatness the way I'm always on the verge

Omg it's the girl from "Hot goblin sex?"!

mercé tonton

Step up the reading comprehension please :)

It's pretty funny having you state, re-state and re-re-state the exact same obvious things that everyone understands while not seeing that everyone gets that, that you're missing the point, and that you're yelling in a hole

Why do you keep going?

Are you that painfully unconvincing in real life like cmon

Step it up

Step up the reading comprehension please :)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A

(a) In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that— (1) (A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and (B) is obscene; or (2) (A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and (B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value; or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.

You're really mad that a US based study is using the US definition of CSAM while also clearly stating the definition of CSAM they're using, aren't you?

Sure buddy, it's a "false equivalence", they're totally stating it's the same. It's not just your reading comprehension

There's no definite conclusion on whether consuming and distributing lolicon content could lead some individuals to seek out or create explicit content involving real children

If they rule that out entirely through the scientific method one day, then I'll join your side

Weebs usually respond to that "Well that's like saying video games cause violence!" so I'll jump ahead of you, that would be like saying we should forbid Lolicon videogames in a society that already has lolicon books, lolicon movies, lolicon cartoons and where history classes mostly cover instances of countries showing lolicon to each other. That's not the situation we're in, and even if it was, it's still not necessarily comparable. Sexual urges have properties that violence doesn't share.

They're studying the prevalence of CSAM under the definition of the country they're in. It'd be arbitrary to separate the two and make two different conclusions.

Also you seriously need to take a chill pill