Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AC
Posts
24
Comments
1,460
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • This is the one I'm using from the dictionary

    free from restriction or limitation; not limited in any way: absolute freedom.

    From your sentence

    [...] you should be able to say anything that is not a direct incitement to actionable violence. Some would call that absolutist

    I think it's clear that by definition they are incorrect.

    However, I'd go further back to another thing you said

    But also I would argue that anyone who is calling anyone else a free speech absolutist is misunderstanding what that other person stands for.

    I disagree there. It's some. "Anyone" is without exception.

  • I think I like this argument. Absolute free speech would make surprising things quasi-legal. Things like CSAM could be shared and people could be forcefully exposed to it "because not doing so would limit my free speech".

    That's a good one.