Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
3
Comments
424
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • This is hilarious. How are we supposed to develop good software if everyone is able to show us where all the flaws are?

  • No worries, I’m hoping someone with a fire in their soul for Linux music production will come along and give us the answers we seek

  • Is there a community or database where people have tested different plugins on Linux either natively or with Wine to see if they can get things working?

  • This isn’t even aggressive, they’re literally showing they won’t work for the company if the company isn’t willing to work for them. All the unions in the US have to play politics with the government and corporations in order to keep things flowing smoothly, one false move and the corporations have the upper hand. With that kind of advantage, it’s the corporations who are aggressive here.

  • I’ve been thinking about setting up a dashboard that I can just let run in the background on my TV or something, the weather over a nice outdoor screensaver or something, maybe important notifications.

    This is a really nice setup!

  • For Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, Canonical plans to polish the Netplan codebase and deliver a Netplan 1.0 release with API/ABI stability. They are also hoping other Linux distributions begin adopting Netplan. Debian so far has decided to go with Netplan for their nework stack on Debian Cloud images.

    That’s probably the reason for pushing it to desktop builds.

  • 24.04 LTS is a distribution intended primarily for servers, desktop is not the priority environment.

  • LCD crystals do have a theoretical maximum, but we don’t have display drivers or transmission standards that support those frequencies.

  • 144Hz is not a holdover in the case of computer monitors. It’s the maximum bandwidth you can push through DVI-D Dual-link at 1080p, which was the only standard that could support that refresh rate when they began producing LCD monitors built to run 144Hz.

  • On your pedantic point, I can’t argue. However, I can say 60Hz power cycles are what set in stone the 60Hz standard. This is in spite of the fact that a lot of countries didn’t even have 60Hz screens until screen controller clock rates were decoupled from power line frequencies.

  • 60Hz was the original clock rate, determined by US power cycles way back in the day. This was 50Hz in some countries.

    With LCD screens, the potential for higher frame rates became easier to achieve. They began to advertise 120Hz TVs and monitors, which set a new bar for frame rates. Some advertise 75Hz monitors, slightly better than 60Hz when crunching numbers. 75Hz is achieved by overclocking standard 60Hz control boards, most can achieve this refresh rate if they allow it. Later HDMI standards, DisplayPort and DVI-D support this frame rate at least up to 2K.

    144Hz is the same trick as 75Hz, this time with a 120Hz control board. The true standard frame rate is 120Hz, it is clocked higher to achieve 144Hz. Why 144 exactly? This was most likely due to the lack of standards that originally supported higher frame rates. Dual-link DVI-D was the only one which could push 144Hz at 1080p. Any higher frame rate (or resolution) and the signal would exceed bandwidth. Now 144Hz is simply a new standard number and plenty of 1440p monitors are set to this frame rate.

  • The UN can’t even get them back their land, what makes you think international law is going to go out of the way to give them money for a domain?

  • Communism is the C in LGBT

  • Same, love using it for terminal and vscode

  • Some legal software only runs on Windows, including some of the proprietary video software used by courts and police departments. There’s a ton of reason they should move towards interoperability in the legal system, but a lot of this software is contract-bound and carries lofty promises of security and privacy.

    That being said, I would try to run those on Wine if it’s possible.

  • I would say most things would not be much different, but circadian rhythm is probably the most relevant part. If your eyes cannot sense sunlight in the morning, your sleep will no longer be affected by daytime hours. Edit: your skin can also sense changes in light, it could potentially also detect sunlight in the morning if exposure is strong enough. Thanks @Repelle for the insight! Article: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1389556721000022

    Our mind doesn’t really process the time we blink, whether light comes through or not. If we had it happen our entire life, I’m sure we’d probably adapt quickly to having a complete blackout when closing our eyes.