Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AS
Posts
5
Comments
679
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Not when the planet and future generations are at stake.

    Aside from even that, I rolled down my window this morning on my way to work to enjoy some fresh air and I got a big blast of toxic exhaust fumes. It's literally poisoning the air around us. IMO people's right to not breathe toxic fumes is more important than someone else's right to drive a gas car just because they like it.

    We aren't there yet in terms of cost or electric charger availability, but once we are we should 100% ban gas cars.

  • Well, yeah? China is a hostile nation to us. They currently have over one million Uighurs in literal concentration camps as well.

    They're the Nazi Germany of Asia, and yet people don't understand why we should stop trading with them since it will affect our sweet, sweet low prices.

  • No, Proton does get a free ride here. The information they provided was the recovery email address, which they were required to do by law.

    The only data they don't encrypt (can see) is that which they absolutely need to store unencrypted. If they encrypt your recovery email address, then... they can't send you any recovery emails to it since they can't see it.

    This is 100% the fault of the user.

    All any service can do is give you the best tools available to maintain your privacy, but they can't stop you from shooting yourself in the foot.

    Firefox is also great for privacy, but if I use it to fill out some info on some phishing sites then that's not a them problem.

  • If you send them the message in plain text they have no way of verifying you aren't just making it up to get someone you don't like banned. Keeping it encrypted means they know the sender wrote it.

  • What I'm perplexed at is - what if I went to the board and said "I have a guaranteed way to increase profit by 150 million - just pay me 50 million a year and fire Bitchai". I would legit do my best to make great decisions for 50 million.

    Why doesn't the board care about cutting costs by cutting CEO pay? I can't imagine any difference that would really justify Bitchai 's pay difference.

    I also cannot imagine they are all part of some secret conspiracy where they all know each other and like each other so much that they just want to pay him that money because they're buddies.

    Wouldn't $150 million be more than enough justification to hire someone else?

  • What I don't understand is why does competition matter for workers but somehow not for CEOs? I kind of understand and agree in the free market to an extent - if you're fine with hiring a dev for $100 instead of another dev for $1000, and you're okay with the difference in quality / time / etc. then go for it. But where is all this competition happening for CEOs?

    Surely someone must be as qualified as Bitchai and willing to do the same job for a measly 100 million a year instead of his 200 million.