araneae @ araneae @beehaw.org

Posts

0

Comments

135

Joined

2 yr. ago

Has anybody read up on dictatorships in general? If we are fortunate we'll endure a 30-50 year autocratic government headed by Trump monarchs and then a ten year period of juntas and civil wars and then finally piss weak liberal democracy again for a bit.

You got what you wanted and skullfucked our country. You can stop putting words into peoples mouths. Above user did not defend the democratic party, they pointed out the party swap and pre-Southern Strategy party makeup. Give it a rest with this shit. No democrat will ever actually be elected ever again, more than likely.

hordes

Go fuck yourself

Sincerely, a member of the "Holy Western Imperial Horde" (the US)

Really now

Yeah this os Facebook grandma stuff. What the hell.

I really feel like you're forgetting this

I think the guy's heart is in the right place though, I think he just hasn't done the legwork yet on studying how modern socialist states are moving on lgbt issues and why they're doing so.

is how you defend that above screenshot people are pointed out. I don't understand how you can't see the contradiction implicit. A person's heart can't be in the right place if they say things like what was said in the original comment. It occurs to me on reread maybe I don't understand it? It's a bit ambiguously worded. But it has popped up before in these conversations and its cited whenever l.ml users reach out to the other big gay instances.

We should accept each other not based on "how modern socialist states are moving". That phrase "doing the leg work" is doing a lot of leg work being nonspecific about what someone is actually learning and internalizing.

Its just uncomfortable to be in a supposedly welcoming space where allyship arises from first principles and not from real empathy. Its not a college class you can study for.

I think this is a community organiser and not a faceless national government. Making lgbt policy and learning in your personal life to be better aren't the same thing. Not dissimilar to when right wingers call something "political."

One would think class struggle would be the first thing socialists would appeal to instead of a milquetoast attempts to reassure people "its okay, the Revolutionary Cause are slowly learning to view you as people!"

Man is a person. He answers to a community. He's not actually a party official of the revolutionary guard and you and I are allowed to demand better. The way I wrote the last post gave you ample opportunity clap back at me with proof from Dessines that he felt differently, which I honestly expect exists somewhere at least as damage control. But instead we are arguing the semantics over whether a man should take responsibilty for his own bigotry or whether the entire global leftist project should bear that burden for him. I'd rather be slurred to my face than have people bullshit me we're on the same side while talking about us like we're props; if only the right ideological mutant strain of intersectional communism that you personally advocate for as being inevitable were to triumph, then the callous way we're discussed will have been justified. You're sharing the table with a bigot, or at least you're leaving a chair open with this rhetoric of pragmatic "usefulness to the cause". I am happy to be proven wrong (for the sake of .ml's community) but even if I am this line of reasoning you employ just does not work.

I don't really know the drama around this guy except The Screenshot everybody posts so I'm not going to act as if I care about his personal opinions, but I don't like what I see as hypocrisy. There can be no allyship with someone who understands our experience purely through the lens of political opportunism. Empathy is the real prerequisite for decency here. There is a lot of talk on this guy and whether he updated his stance after that screenshot but I don't think it matters unless he signals himself a understanding of lgbt people as human fools trapped in the same exploitation he is. And hell I don't know, maybe he wrote that post awhile ago, and if he did good for him. But it rather seems like he lets people speak for him on this issue.

Forcing pronoun disclosure is not necessarily helpful to the trans community, especially those questioning. Do you guys have a questioning tag or something? We have a few users bouncing around on Beehaws for instance that don't concieve of themselves as human. This stuff is complicated.

This is a weird take. Lgbt people shouldn't need to be a useful pawn for socialism in order to be treated with respect. We deserve rights and respect because we're as human as the rest of you theoretically. If someone ostensibly left-wing or socialist needs to read theory in order value my life and needs as a proletarian ally then they can necessarily be no ally of mine. More work needs to be done beyond tacit academic acceptance.

What other minority has to be vetted for their use before being welcomed into your so-called revolutionary project?

Godot is WOKE and queerdo indie devs are using it to make WOKE games because they are UNCREATIVE HACKS who can't into game engine thats why WE FORKED GODOT AND CHANGED ONE LETTER

Oh so its now completely impossible to stop a brigade by shuttering a subreddit for a day or two without begging some pea brain Reddit stooge. That won't lead to anything putrid happening to small and medium subreddits on a regular basis I hope.

My friend you are talking to a dork or possibly a bot. Lemmy is infested. Maybe its a paid troll or maybe they're just fucking strikingly stupid/accelerationists (but I repeat myself) but they're basically out here to drive you mad. Talk to your real world friends about this topic and try phonebanking.

If it were up to this individual Trump would have walked into office on Jan 20th 2021 right after attempting a fascist coup. Because then the matetial conditions for The Revolution would come or something. Every four years like clockwork the accelerationists backed by bots come out of the woodwork to try and make sure Donald Trump wins because WHOEVER he is running against must be worse, not by dint of actually being a worse person or statesman than DJT, but because they're not the FALGSC messiah. You're talking to a death cultist.

Interesting, thank you for the reply. I am not a hacker nor a gnostic but I have a slight fascination with the latter. But on hacking: while there's merit to your position that hacker culture is reactionary I have to ask what do you think of hacker collectives like the one that leaked Project 2025 or other noble computer nerd activities? It seems to me like a hacker is exercizing another avenue of power over her world like jumping or singing. Thinking the online world is seperate and intangible from our non-online experience seems to be making the mistake of dualism in upholding one sphere of reality over the other/s.

hacker culture is intrinsically gnostic and reactionary

Do you nind elaborating a bit?

P R A X I S

R

A

X

I

S

You and what army?

If AI bros were serious about existential risk and problems of alignment instead of attempting to form a cult of technobabble to make themselves superior and scrounge for venture capital... They'd pull the plug.

Altman is selling what he alledges he dreads more than anything: AI that would lie to you without a second (or even first) literal thought.

If you formed this chat clique you have to lead it and not be coy about it. If I were you I would talk privately with Ann and tell her not to spew the negativity. She could possibly have a blog type "quarantine room" for venting. But you should put your best foot forward and present a friendly space. Stick to your guns about that and people who don't want that will self select out. When Ann is ranting you'll look chill in comparison and maybe you can talk to her about who you both want to flirt with. You made a colleague chat, you have to, err, chat with your colleagues.