Also eating the half popped kernels is absolutely a phase. Especially if it involves gradually lowering your standards of what a half popped kernel is until youre just biting off the point of the kernels
As a tall, tatted goth lady, many people have the first impression of me that I am intimidating and edgy, which couldn't be further from the truth. So, sample size of me, this tracks.
The user was referred to as "he" in the all the documentation. Random made up example "if the user wants to change his settings he will click this button in the top left" or whatever.
A very normal PR was raised that just changed these uses to be gender neutral and it was declined for being too political.
I'm so happy you're finding your way out of a pit! I don't know why you think it would be an unpopular thing to share, you're on Beehaw here! People tend to be(e) a bit nicer
Hmm, you're quite right. My intuition is that the Bayesian portion would exactly offset the Monty hall portion. I think, at a glance, Bayes would give door 1 a 2/3 probability of having 6 gold, but Monty Hall would give door 2 the same probability, so we can effectively cancel these out and just consider a raw probability
You either have 5 gold or 2 gold 3 silver behind door 1, and 6 gold or 3 and 3 behind door 2, which gives door 2 a very slight edge. Does that check out?
Imagine cashing in on a 100k year voyage which will only probably go wrong 10k-99.9k years after you die. Easy money for a capitalist, even if it involves making a vessel that can last that long
Sure, but how do you eat your popcorn?
Also eating the half popped kernels is absolutely a phase. Especially if it involves gradually lowering your standards of what a half popped kernel is until youre just biting off the point of the kernels