I know the definitions. The cross-eyed method is way easier for me than the wall-eyed one. It's not that I don't want to believe you, friend. I'm just reporting what I saw. Did you check the picks yourself with both methods? I did.
I'm not a doctor, but this sounds a lot like the start of schizophrenia. You need someone competent to evaluate this possibility, because in case it was that, you need antipsychotics immediately - early medication can save you from lasting brain damage, every week counts!
You understood the meaning, that's what communication is for. Let people use their prefered words, no need to let your blood presure rise because of people's preferences. Use what ever you want to use and let others live rant-free.
Apart from directly catholic gays, there are also gays in very catholic countries, where their lives are influenced heavily by catholic stances no matter whether they believe or not.
That's the problem, people are very diverse. Look around yourself for examples of couples (in real-life, not online), and I'm sure you'll find many examples of "ugly" people of all genders being in happy relationships. I know a guy with a facial deformation in relationship with a beautiful woman, I know a seriously fat couple. The forever single people I know mostly have severe mental or personality issues.
Stopping dating because of looks sounds misogynistic. It implies all women are superficial, which is simply not true. I know several cases of men that could be seen as ugly for different reasons, who had no problem to find a partner thanks to their personality.
This works perfectly for me with the cross-eyed approach, yes.
No disrespect meant when I asked if you tested your pictures. You know, it IS possible to swich the pictutes without testing, so it made sense to ask.
Thanks for being patient and troubleshooting my apparent viewing anomaly.