How do the likes of JD Vance and Drumpf rationalise no more DEI when they have wives who are DEI? It makes no sense.
andallthat @ andallthat @lemmy.world Posts 2Comments 418Joined 2 yr. ago
andallthat @ andallthat @lemmy.world
Posts
2
Comments
418
Joined
2 yr. ago
Locked Removed
Trump calls Signal chat fallout a 'witch hunt,' says the messaging app 'could be defective'
Locked Removed Deleted
Permanently Deleted
One of the few areas where representation is fair is assholery. There are real assholes from all genders, ethnicity and religious backgrounds.
You can be non-white, non-binary, non-wasp and still be an asshole. And other assholes will accept you, if it helps shield their evil agenda from the most obvious accusations.
And guess what political side has learned to leverage that fact? I'll give you a few hints. Neonazi AfD in Germany has a lesbian leader with a Sri Lankan partner, the italian far right party (staunch defender of family values) has a leader who's a never married single mom (and now she's Italy's prime minister), then you already mentioned Trump and Vance.
Don't get me wrong, Usha Vance, Melania Trump, Giorgia Meloni, Alice Weidel aren't being exploited. They are all formidable persons who got to the top by out-assholing everyone else on their side and by actively banking on their "non traditional" status to emerge in ultra-conservative environments.
So they don't need to rationalize anything. It's all already quite rational and by design.