Yeah, I can see how half of their workforce (which was apparently 120 people, I can't read) could be just people who negotiate the deals and such. Best of luck to everyone.
Ehh not really; at least if you care about your own anonymity. Sure the communication is as private as the weakest link (or less because now you have to trust the bot relaying it, too), but nobody from Discord would be able to easily look up your identity.
Because it has significantly more features than IRC and it's dead simple to spin up your own "server" where you aren't beholden much to "admins" or whatever.
Holy fucking shit they fired 830 employees. Considering what Bandcamp has done (nothing for years despite being pretty terrible UX-wise) and how simple it is, why the fuck did they originally have 1600+ employees?
A startup with < 50 people could make it work. They don't need hundreds of employees. Lay off more and actually focus on development FFS.
How do you network with zero or close to zero initial "connections"?
Sure it's easy to get jobs when you already have a dozen happy clients who recommend you to others. But how do you start initially? Through friends and their connections?
I mean that has been their business model for some time now, just like with most other software nowadays. But unlike most other software their prices are extremely reasonable; when you buy it consecutively for years you get progressive discounts. I actually *need * only one editor but I pay for them all because the cost of the full package is just slightly higher and their IDEs are amazing. A few times a year I use one of the "other" editors for personal projects and such.
Quality clothes (not to be confused with expensive brands which is something completely different and probably not quality) is usually much cheaper in the long term while providing more value.
Especially stuff like footwear can be "buy it for life" as long as you can find a quality product and take some care of it.
Unfortunately most people are also lazy and don't really want the "hassle" of taking care of their stuff because it's easier to just throw stuff away and buy new things.
Yeah the only difference between expensive and "cheap" brands is that the expensive brands somehow managed to convince you to buy the exact same crap while extracting way more money from you.
Quality products can be relatively cheap. Not the cheapest, but not overly expensive either.
Yes. You need to not use any other content blocker (including potentially browser tracking protection) and keep uBo up to date. Occasionally it might not be up to date with latest YT changes but that's pretty rare.
When someone builds a skyscraper and then you take one small unit in it and paint the walls a color you like and change the light fixtures, would you say that you built the skyscraper?
Because that's what Brave (and everyone else who builds on top of Chrome codebase) does.
When the builders then decide to remake the wiring in the whole building so it doesn't work with your new light fixtures you bend over and take it because you don't have a choice - you have nowhere near close enough resources to remake the whole wiring for yourself.
Ehh there is only so much a single person can care about. If you have a life and aren't effectively an activist/lobbyis by profession you can't care about politics both local and global, preserving nature and ecolody, world hunger & disease, and a million other things like which software company is less evil all at once and follow through 100%, supporting all of the causes meaningfully.
Not to mention we have to make compromises, too.
There’s one and literally only one browser that actually stands for all the things the most vocal people around here claim to care about.
Hard disagree. Firefox had its fair share of controversies, it's still technically funded by Google (while not accepting donations), and Mozilla Foundation as a nonprofit is pretty questionable too.
The leadership of Mozilla Corporation is shit too like any other corp; they lay off engineers and give themselves huge bonuses.
It takes them years to even acknowledge simple bugs, let alone actually getting to fix them.
A huge part of why Firefox lost the "browser wars" is also that they failed to make it easy to build into other apps so it could work more like Electron, while also pissing off users with surface changes that break their workflow.
Overall it's better than Chrome especially if you care about privacy, but it's not a huge win.
You can use options to create a shortcut that immediately opens a specific profile, which is great (you also need -no-remote though). I have a main profile as default but when WFH I use a shortcut to open a work profile (which has a separate sync profile, different addons, etc).
Not really as long as you use some VPN that's not braindead stupid like OpenVPN. Wireguard is the perfect protocol, there's almost no overhead since it doesn't need keepalive packets or anything and there's no handshake beyond the initial connection either.
Yes, especially for simpler/smaller websites there can be hundreds or thousands behind a single IPv4 address.
Or if you have a larger infrastructure provider, use any kind of CDN or "target cloaking" or whatever there could be millions of different hosts on a single publicly visible address. (Or more like multiple shared addresses).
Amju Wolf @ amju_wolf @pawb.social Posts 2Comments 368Joined 2 yr. ago
Yeah, I can see how half of their workforce (which was apparently 120 people, I can't read) could be just people who negotiate the deals and such. Best of luck to everyone.