amanneedsamaid @ amanneedsamaid @sopuli.xyz

Posts

1

Comments

495

Joined

2 yr. ago

I think that I'm better simply because of my early exposure to the internet (as this article assumes would be true of the next generation). I think the difference is in how the internet is being presented to children now versus a decade ago. Many kids today can hardly install an application to a computer, I believe because they see technology as just a part of life to take or leave, not the "exciting new thing".

Why try to use a computer when you can use a chromebook, and now that the internet is so cushy, lets click some links!

For real. What happened to a normal conservative platform without any nutty conspiracies, racism, or climate denial tacked on?

A University named after a disgusting, abhorrently racist and radical man makes derogatory decision.

I see the logic if someones asking about a violent offense, but hypothetical questions about nonviolent crime are totally ok.

Hypothetical questions about details of a nonviolent crime should be allowed.

Shouldn't be a rule, at least not one that broad. Ruins the fun imo.

Touché, but that rule is absolutely retarded.

Last I checked hypothetically asking the likelihood of getting away with a crime is not an "illegal question". Dont even get me started on the snoody oversimplification of "Bioterrorism is not funny".

Nope, its a hypothetical. They asked a real question, with no implication of actually carrying out the action. The question is how likely you would be to get away with it. Hypothetical questions about illegal activity (especially one as obviously not serious as this) are not a stupid question, or one that should be frowned upon.

You dont understand what this community is for.

The people downvoting this are fucking idiots. There are NO stupid questions.

Strawberry !!

I would recommend using one with wayland compatibility if you can. Might as well not have to switch later.

If now that youve left the groupchat your roommates just forget to invite you, even if that what they're used to, that says A LOT about your friends. I disagree that sending you a message is "out of their way", it takes an infintismally amount of effort to message someone a time and place. Also, messaging you just is not out of their way, its right in their path if anything. (Assuming they have any desire to see you)

Ah, I totally misunderstood. Downvote recinded !

EDIT: I actually double misunderstood, I hadn't even realized the guy I was responding to mentioned bill reminders at all, my bad !

Deadass, doing the same thing he did in almost any other place or time throughout human history would've led to an execution.

That comparison makes no sense.

SimpleX has worked great in my experience! Currently torn between SimpleX and XMPP.

I cannot recommend Siskin, as those in my life that have tried it have always experienced random issues. I find Monal to be a better experience in every way, except for the lack of calling support with Conversations.

I would say not inviting that person is doing it intentionally, as everyone knows that person isn't in the group chat. Also, it does not make you much harder to invite, it's literally just letting your friend know outside of the group chat.

If your friends leave you out of things for this reason, they don't want to hang out with you very much.