Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AL
alphatool @ alphatool @sh.itjust.works
Posts
0
Comments
10
Joined
2 yr. ago

Starship Integrated Flight Test 4 Launch Discussion and Updates Thread!

Jump

  • Soft landing for super heavy ✅ Starship cruising in space ✅

    A couple of engines failed, but wow, so much improvement on each flight.

    • Starship Integrated Flight Test 4 Launch Discussion and Updates Thread!

    Jump

  • Awesome seeing condensation moving up as fuel gets loaded

    • Work Underway on Large Cargo Landers for NASA’s Artemis Moon Missions - NASA

    Jump

  • I think that NASA is happy. It's a very tight timeline for starship and the spacesuits from Artemis, but, despite decades of work and plentiful funding, Orion seems to be the slowest part of the critical path. I think that we'd be hearing a lot of public criticism if SpaceX was dragging the chain.

    • The next Starship mission has a tentative launch date: March 14

    Jump

  • The change from landing in the Pacific to the Indian Ocean is really interesting but I haven't seen much detail about why it's happening. The best I've come up with is that Starlink improvements allow for enough telemetry that the Pacific Missile Test Range facilities aren't needed any more, but it would be great to find out more about why it's changed.

    • SpaceX HLS Mission Concept - GAO Report

    Jump

  • They've made Orion look bigger than Starship - I don't know whether to laugh or cry

    • FAA have issued the launch license for IFT-2!

    Jump

    • SpaceX teases another application for Starship

    Jump

  • Is anyone actually surprised by this announcement? To me it seems like such a trivial development that it was always going to happen.

    Wet workshops are more interesting, and I honestly don't know if they will ever happen with Starship. In the short term, I think that they are more effort than they are worth - it will be easier to make a habitat on earth then launch it than to try and fabricate something in space. That will all change as we develop in-orbit fabrication technology, and I can see a time not that far in the future where cutting into an empty fuel tank to create an inhabitable space would be an easy day's work. This leads to a question of timing, and I think that Starship will be replaced by better vehicles before in-orbit fabrication becomes routine. Could go either way though and both are very exciting prospects!

    • SpaceX on Twitter: "Booster 9 on the pad"

    Jump

  • What happens with booster 9 and hot staging is one of the most interesting questions about starship at the moment. I can see three possibilities for it - booster 9 gets scrapped without flying and they skip to booster 10, it gets modified for hot staging or it gets launched with minimal modifications. I think modifications before flight are the most likely, but it would be really interesting to see what happens with an unmodified booster. Just how much damage would hot staging do? Pretty much any outcome would be spectacular!

    • Derek Newsome @DerekdotSpace: "Saw some concern earlier about SLC-6s flame trench holding up to Falcon Heavy due to Delta IV Heavy having significantly less thrust, I'd like to put that to rest."

    Jump

  • The article is worth it just for the pictures! Great shots from the early shuttle days

    • Falcon 9 launches ESA’s Euclid space telescope

    Jump

  • Aside from the awesome satellite that was launched, I was amazed by the quality of footage during the landing. Rock solid HD from both the 1st stage and the barge. It's not long since dropping out was universal, and it's a great example of how much better starlink is than any other satellite internet.