Assuming your numbers are correct, after one year the interest is $70. I doubt you’d get anyone out to conduct the inspection at that price, let alone two because you need one at move in and one at move out; and let’s not even get started about potential the additional work should there be a dispute by the tenant or the landlord.
You mean they keep a portion of the deposit to determine who receives the payout?
If you meant they only keep a portion of the revenues produced by the investment, which obviously must be one of the safest ones available and thus will have low return on investment, I'm afraid that would not be economically viable for the escrow company.
If it falls through again in a week or two, I have more faith in the Trump administration to potentially bring peace again than in the Biden administration. Biden was unwilling to use any serious leverage in order to get the Israeli government to stop the genocide.
I don’t like Trump. I merely acknowledge he has been far more successful in stopping the genocide compared to Biden. I do not agree with the Trump administration illegally detaining people.
Imagine thinking ChatGPT only provides “glorified autocorrect bullshit” and not elements of information that are good enough and that you can further validate yourself easily.
I would argue it does not look increasingly likely that European countries will put boots on the ground considering most of them rule out this option if the United States are not involved, and the United States stated several times they will not be involved.
It's important to prevent conflict of interests but asking the city to step in in every single rental agreement is not necessarily an effective solution. Someone else here suggested having the cost split between the tenant and the landlord, which has the merit of addressing the potential conflict of interest.
Unfortunately 9 Democrats followed him…