agitatedpotato @ agitatedpotato @lemmy.world

Posts

2

Comments

843

Joined

2 yr. ago

I do, im responding to the person who's dodging the question.

If you were a communist you'd like guns, and revert to the strong 'under no pretext' instead of the weak 'shall not be infringed'

Yes the right implied is to keep an bear any arms. You know private citizens can and have bought tanks right? Why do you presume I would disagree with that?

Yes the right implied is to keep an bear any arms. You know private citizens can and have bought tanks right? Why do you presume I would disagree with that?

So your advice to people in an active shooter situation is to always run? Not seek cover? Not stay low and observe the situation? Just run 100% of the time? I pray you don't take your own advice.

This is just might makes right ideaology. What about women? Should they be subjugated to the will of any criminal that happens to be stronger than them?

Ask Floridians looking for flood or even just normal home insurance how competition is working for them.

Reminds of a few states with magazine capacity bans written so narrowly that they cannot be construed to also apply to belt fed weapons and for the low price of 2000 dollars you can order a part for any AR you own to convert it into a belt fed. Following laws is only for poor people.

So is your right to food though. No ones legally bound to give you food if you don't make enough money. Thank goodness people do, but that's not because of any type of law requiring them to do so. Theres nothing on the books that would make it illegal to allow people to starve. Furthermore, all rights are dependent on money because who's going to stop violating the righrs of someone who cannot sue them?

Thats literally the dominant thought on how to ensure world peace in the age of nukes too, have enough nukes that it keeps anyone who also has nukes at bay. If you have a better solution for the afformentioned pandoras box situation package it for nuclear arms and take it to NATO, they'd love to hear it.

Federal officers are fully immune though.

Motor vehicles arent a right, travel is. If motor vehicles were explicitly named then those would be illegal. Motor vehicles are not the sole form of travel.

Thats a lot of sentences to not tell me why Biden should allow them to continue a dress rehersal for civil war.

If VI Lenin was alive I'd write him in. Especially since Stalin isn't, so he can't repeat his worst mistake.

With nothing but a command he could stop this. Instead he lets the proto fascist leaders to practice deploying troops throughout America. Why do you think they're practicing this during an election year? Biden is letting the practice couping.

Oh thats hilarious, did they take notes from the Biden impeachment movement?

Wider war sound real pofitable for the largest political donors, so we're fucked. No candidate from the current establishments will challenge them.

Fuck the genocide deniers.