afunkysongaday @ afunkysongaday @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

82

Joined

2 yr. ago

It's slang for military butt sex.

No idea if it's allowed but I got that exact same popup in Europe.

Solus. Snaps optional.

Honestly I thought it was an abbreviation for "for example" and probably used it one gazillion times 😅 now that I google it it seems like "e.g." is what I was going for.

Idk which third party apps are compliant which aren't? There is this one feg: https://f-droid.org/packages/it.belloworld.mercurygram/ Unlocks the premium app icons for free. https://f-droid.org/packages/nekox.messenger/ This one surely has a few premium features no? Unlimited accounts feg?

Personally I just use Telegramm-FOSS since years. Not sure what the actual differences to official client are at the moment, but this one is just fine and I'm never annoyed by premium feature ads like it seems to be the case for you.

I highly doubt that F-Droid team removes third party telegramm apps when they are against tos of telegramm. They are actually out there defending our freedom, even and especially when proprietary services do not want us to use Foss third party apps. Google does not want you to use third party apps for their services. F-Droid still out there publishing foss YouTube clients. Give them some credit instead of just assuming they suck up to big companies.

Yet another problem the free market will surely solve aaaaany minute now.

"See when I slap you in the face that's actually a really nice thing of me to do. Because if I don't slap you in the face I'd kick you in the groin really hard instead. Do you want to get kicked in the groin? No? That's what I thought."

I'm just not business savy enough to even understand the concept of this sale. So I'm not buying the building obviously. Also it seems like a regular post office. What am I actually spending half a million on here?

A little niche, but I am really happy with solusos! It's a small distro, so software availability is the biggest issue imo. But if what you need is available it beats every other distro out there for casual desktop use!

Imo dual boot can lead to issues if you got both os on one drive. In this configuration Windows tends to mess with the Linux partitions. But I never had any issues with one os per drive.

I invite everyone to have a critical look at the study. https://www.ascl.org.uk/ASCL/media/ASCL/Help%20and%20advice/Inclusion/Safer-scrolling.pdf

Personally, they lost me on page 12.

They did. And then they lied about the value.

Yes and the drop is only a couple of years ahead 💀 rip China

Do you think vinyls are replacing Spotify and other music streaming? They are not even competing on the same playing field. Vinyls are mostly collectors items today, they are for sure not the default way to actually listen to music. And they will never be that again.

I'm actually a fan of physical media! I just don't think they will be a widely adopted way to consume media ever again. My DVD collection is sitting on the shell untouched since many many years.

Also, I'm going to bury it. Yes I know previous poster said us pack animals don't do that but who gives a shit I am not part of your system. I also know this deck is built out of solid wood planks so of course I am not actually burying anything, I'm just scratching up your deck really badly. But this I will do and nothing can stop me.

Yeah but physical copies of movies are not really on a comeback, but piracy on the other hand is.

Old dude should be titled "piracy" instead.

... so in Canada a stranger can name your kids? Or, you know, maybe the parents?

Parents have all kinds of rights simply because they are the parents and not just because of general rights like freedom of expression. Obviously. If you disagree I'll happily choose the name of your next kid. Because, you know, parents have no rights besides those everyone has anyways.

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_interest/child_law/resources/child_law_practiceonline/child_law_practice/vol-35/february-2016/parental-rights-cases-to-know/

I get that the article is trying to make a point for children's rights, I fully support that, but the choice for a headline is really, really bad. If you care about the matter you should not defend that headline because it makes the "pro child rights" side look silly. As if the only way for children to have rights was denying the existence of rights of parents. That does not help anyone.

Interestingly, the commentary on Article 85 of the Third Geneva Convention includes “the wearing of civilian clothing by members of the armed forces for purposes of disguise” as an example of a war crim

Bonus points because guess where I read that?

https://en.idi.org.il/media/6191/combatants_dressed_as_civilians.pdf

It seems like some things just don't change.

There’s no such thing as ‘parents’ rights’

Parents have a right to raise their children in accordance with their own values

Great start!