Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AB
Posts
0
Comments
139
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Yes Mint is a good choice for your migration. It has been put together in a way that makes it intuitive for a windows refugee. The menu layout has the "start" (mint) button bottom left with your apps in there.

    The system apps are named obvious things like "software manager" and it has default apps installed to get you going.

    Being derived from Ubuntu it is the best supported platform for commercial apps/games but with Ubuntu's weird choices (snap etc) tidied up.

    It's the most recommended linux distro for beginners for a reason. It's a solid reliable well thought out platform

  • scientists and researchers, is that they throw more money at it.

    You seem to be using the present tense there rather than the past tense. Are you sure that's still true. I was under the impression the Bibulous Bumbling Bill had slashed research budgets (among other things like medicaid) in order to fund billionaire tax cuts.

    Not to mention the attempts to proscribe what can be researched that Harvard is currently litigating

  • Sure, but the business case for a nuclear plant straight up doesnt stack up unless you're weighing some parameter other than the best interests of the public. The facts on the costs and timelines are sitting right there.

    Build out renewables - you get faster power on the grid (a couple of years vs a couple of decades) AND the power is cheaper. LOTS cheaper.

  • And yet Hinkley C was approved in 2010 and is still not finished, current cost is at 3 times the orginal budget and ETA is now 2030 from originally 2023 (and may slip further).

    What's worse is they contract in a fixed price for the power generated which is way higher than renewables can generate it for. So we're paying more for our electricity.

  • China is indeed our largest trading partner but the Australian approach is a bit more nuanced. Previous experience has taught that China will try to control if they perceive weakness. We had a trade "dispute" (deliberate chinese sanctions) because they objected to Oz politicians discussing the source of covid. We diversified. But we didnt roll over.

    There is a current conflict between the fact we have heavily aligned with the US post WW2 and them going fascist while the majority of our markets are in Asia.

    We cannot simply kowtow to China, it straight up doesnt work and isnt respected. But we can no longer rely on the US as an ally and need to strengthen our ties locally.

    I'm hopeful that Japanese & Korean defence overtures with Europe, and European ties with Canada & UK will draw together a "free world" defence alliance against the fascists and dictators.

    Here's hoping its only a cold war.

  • I'm saying the Marshalls are this body, they should be reassigned directly to the judiciary.

    Which involves asking the oppressing person/organisation to hand over the capability to resist them.

    "Please Mr Mugger, give me your gun, then you can't rob me"

    How exactly do you think that request is going to go ?

  • Ok we're talking at cross purposes.

    Yes, mullvad has a noble repo, it doesnt have a xia repo (which is the mint equivalent version name)

    Attempting to add the mullvad repo using the old ubuntu instructions failed because noble =/= xia

    Yes you can work around that but its not beginner level.

    Op asked if Flatpaks was the answer whivh imho it isnt, the best answer is downloading the .deb

  • Really sorry, it's too long ago to remember the exact error,

    but IIRC

    when you followed the ubuntu instructions for adding the repository it would kick an error because the command included a reference to noble and mint os name is xia so the contents of the osrelease when checked didnt match and it threw an error.

    Could be wrong, I didnt document it.

    The work around was to edit the commands.

    All a moot point now as

    a) the instructions now on the mullvad site don't reference noble and

    b) mullvad now appears to be in the mint store (which is how you should always install if possible

    Not correct, only true if you've manually added the repo

  • Further to this, mullvad vpn and browser are now in the Mint store.

    Download and install from there

    EDIT

    Apols, they're not, I checked on the machine I had faffed around with to get the mullvad repo working. Please ignore

  • Where does mullvad say it's not meant to be used on Mint ? I literally have it running on 5 mint devices.

    Can't see that on their website at a quick search

    Saying it is not supported is not the same as not meant to be used

    In fact to the contrary this references install for mint

    https://mullvad.net/en/help/install-mullvad-app-linux

    Got to the section that says

    "Download and install the app"

    For a command line explanation

    Honestly though just download the .deb and double click on it out of the folder to get debi to install. It's all gui and easy

  • Doesn't always work - for example the mullvad browser won't install on mint with the ubuntu instructions as OS version gets reported as Xia not noble (if I'm recalling the issue correctly it was 6-9 months ago)

    Yes you can amend the commands to get it to work but it's definitely not beginner level, I had to faff around for an hour or so before I worked it out

  • For mullvad vpn the client will tell you when there's an update available by a very obvious flag in the app that you click on to download it then click/double click on the file out of the downloads to get debi to install it.

    To answer the broader question, where ever possible install apps via software manager, that way they are updated with apt / update manager.

    I would suggest using flatpacks sparingly as they are disk hogs.

  • No one is suggesting it's a good thing, but trying to make out a correction on the scope of the problem (UK vs a subset) is an attempt to justify it, is an emotional overreaction or an attempt to pick an argument where none exists. Cool your jets son.

  • There are 8 current dukedoms https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_dukedoms_in_the_United_Kingdom

    And about 3 times that many historical dukedoms. So 2 of 8 is a small number 2 of 28 an even smaller number.

    By eyeball the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancashire are less than 5% of the land mass of the United Kingdom and maybe 10% of the population tops, so "only" meaning a small portion would be fair.

    Having said that, from context I think you're inferring the wrong meaning of "only" - I would read that as singling out the two impacted areas (regardless of comparative size). In other words "of all the UK specifically (only) these two areas are affected.

    I'm not OP so could be wrong of course. Often am.

  • It's a real word. And used correctly in context so unlikely to be a typo.

    https://www.dictionary.com/browse/backronym

    https://www.wordnik.com/words/backronym

    Acronyms were very rare prior to about mid 20thC.

    A number of words sound like they should be an acronym or people searching for an explanation of them make backronyms out of them.

    Posh and rap being turned into acronyms as per the first like are good examples of a backronym.