I understand how capitalist competition often ends in monopoly, at least until the government steps in with anti-trust or there is significant innovation to undermine the monopoly. I wouldn't say this is the defining characteristic of capitalism because I use the word to describe countries that aren't total free markets because there aren't any countries that have totally free markets.
You didn't answer my question though, you just gave a list of countries (some of which, like China, I question are socialist at all). Are there any countries where "working class holds power, and the core economy of the country is either publicly or cooperatively owned" that have out-innovated countries that use capitalism?
What is the primary force that spurs innovation in a socialist country and how does it compare to the force that spurs innovation in a capitalist country?
2: This is genuinely a curse; You will remember every little thing that happens to you and it will haunt you forevermore.
Wouldn't perfect memory recall just let you recall memories, not necessarily be forced to recall them? Whether or not you chose to do it or it haunts you seems more like a matter of mental health...
Can you point to an example of a socialist country (by your definition of socialist) that is superior in a certain industry innovation-wise compared to a capitalist (by your definition of capitalist) country?
Also, Idk what you define capitalism as, but I'm pretty sure meriam webster doesn't call it "a system for concentrating wealth". That might be a common result for many types of capitalism, but it is not the defining characteristic.
How about not ending capitalism, but trying as hard as possible to anticipate and balance the negative effects of wealth concentration with the overall beneficial effects of competative innovation?
Is this a Jreg video?