Zorque @ Zorque @kbin.social

Posts

0

Comments

1,457

Joined

2 yr. ago

Indeed. Plenty of intelligent, ruthless people don't succeed. Luck is definitely one of many significant factors.

Well if you don't think so, it must be true, right?

And most of the people who cause all this heinous shit aren't nearly as publicly facing as the ones you mention. Because they're not idiots. They use the public facing fools as scapegoats for their actions.

How does it feel to lap that up?

Luckily the military is uniquely equipped to do that.

Are you saying Clinton writes opinion pieces under the pseudonym John Pavlovitz?

Also, are you saying that politicians should just sit down and die when they don't win something? I mean, based on your rhetoric, you seem like the exact kind of person that thinks all politicians should just die, so I wouldn't be surprised.

What if I need to change the SIM?

Would it be out of the environment?

Military courts are generally less kind than civilian ones.

Yes, but being intelligent and ruthless means you're more likely to succeed.

You can have multiple traits that affect things. It's almost never just one thing or another.

Clinton hasn't run since she "lost" to Trump.

I just do that so the cat doesn't stare awkwardly at me while I poo.

When he doesn't try and take a look in the bowl during the action, at least.

I feel like tons of food in Louisiana would be incredibly unhealthy.

And every single headline gives him even more attention, and keeps him in the minds of the people who would vote for him.

It doesn't matter if we think it's justice, they will see it as a continuing campaign of disinformation and unwarranted attacks on a patriot.

All this coverage does is give you a hate-boner, and invigorates them.

Well, not providing them the weapons they use to kill civilians would certainly help. Other economic sanctions (like the ones used against that other aggressive nation Russia) can help as well. Actually voting in the UN resolutions (weak as they are) would be something as well.

Literally anything more than a metaphorical finger wagging.

If that's literally your only metric, maybe.

If there's no child labor, then everything is a-okay in your book?

And Margaret Thatcher was doing her own disassembly of worker's rights. They enabled each other, but one wasn't wholly dependent on the other for their actions.

Cause we can vote in more than just the presidential election, and the DNC is made up of more than just the president.

All those congress-people have power, too, and there's at least two elections for them before 2028.

No shit?

But that doesn't mean the words exchanged between Bibi and Biden will actually have that effect. And cheering for empty words won't make it so.

If it stops, sure. But these are words, not actions. Bibi is not a petulant child who won't get desert if he doesn't get his room cleaned, he's a megalomaniacal autocrat hell-bent on using the lives of Palestinians as a political tool to maintain his power in Israel.

Biden being concerned with his poll numbers won't change that. Until he takes actual action to stop the slaughter of innocent civilians, it's just empty air.

Capitalism isn't exclusive to the US. It's definitely a major breeding ground for the worst aspects of it, but it's hardly unique in that regard.

A lot of youtubers and such only make announcements for content and streams via twitter, or their own services that kind of suck worse in terms of access. In order to stay on top of some limited access content, twitter is still "useful" in that regard.

Personally, I've never used it for that, I mostly ever checked twitter when a site I visit or game I play is down and they don't have a good way of conveying details otherwise. But I know of content creators that use it for that, so I'd understand people using it to stay abreast of content that way.