ZoopZeZoop @ ZoopZeZoop @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

583

Joined

2 yr. ago

Year old account, very few controversial opinions posted, a few negative point comments, but we all have them. I don't think they were trying to troll. Perhaps they were trying to make sense of the situation and just improperly applied the term as an experiment to see if it fit. I didn't block this one, like I do most people who are trolling.

And, Palin actually involved her daughter in things to help demonstrate how everything was okay. She put her daughter on display for her own political gain.

Not in every state.

Do you need us to call someone for you?

It's a contest and they are required to have terms and conditions--look it up. It's a technicality and Trump thinks he's better than us poors, but it makes it legal, not the right thing to do. If there was evidence he never intended to have dinner with them, that would be illegal.

Yes, he's been meeting with the leaders across the world. There's no way they weren't discussing the conflicts with which they are involved. I felt particularly betrayed by Volodymyr Zelenskyy meeting with Trump. If that wasn't a sting to catch Trump in the act that was in trade for more arms and supplies, I'm angry.

The toilet paper or his asscheeks?

Why? What is she planning for your anus that requires callouses? You should inquire. That sounds suspicious!

In the article it said that the terms of the contest said that if it did not happen, a substitute prize would be chosen. Then, it said that it was reported a couple (from Mississippi) won it. Those details weren't confirmed independently, but they probably wriggled enough to be off the hook.

Yes, or embrace being a basement dweller. Or even not care if he called them that because they "are still better than whatever Democrats are."

The first amendment has some pretty solid limitations. Someone could argue they don't apply here, but I don't think that would hold. Any constitutional lawyers have a take on this?

That said, the likelihood that he's convicted of it, sentenced, without a stay, where he sits a day in jail is sooooo slim that it's practically two dimensional. As you said, there are barriers and interference everywhere, and he's the king of stalling lawsuits.

I say we send him to Russia, revoke his citizenship, use tax dollars to pay the victims, and call it breaking even.

With Laura's name, and also Greg? Or with your and your partner's names?

Didn't we already know she thought he was rude? Regardless, who cares. The fact that some rich person from some other country agreed with us isn't news worthy.

Yes, but that kind of rebellion is even more dangerous there.

I get your point, but if anyone goes over there, they're bringing their underage children, and those children will likely suffer. So, I'd rather them stay and be safe than be right and have them suffer. I don't wish ill on those hateful people, for the most part, I wish them a clear view of the social, political, and economic landscapes.

Now, the people who intentionally hatemonger for profit, like Alex Jones, I would not be sad if they met an untimely fate.

Also, we'd have to hear them pronounce it to know if it was an acronym or an initialism, if my understanding is correct.

I recognized the name, but couldn't place it until I heard the voice.

I'm assuming he's male, but no females are collecting his packets.

Sure, anything could happen. I think Taylor Swift has enough money and reach to make herself heard if she really wants, in a way that leaves no doubt. Yes, people will pick and choose, but if they're choosing to believe Taylor Swift supports Trump, they aren't dealing with reality anyway. Those people were going to vote for Trump no matter what because they look for every little sign of support for Trump, no matter how ludicrous it is.